You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Proposed HF Changes to bring voting back In line with its intended purpose - rewarding quality.
Very good read. I do have a concern though and I am not sure if it is one that can be handled by the developers. However, I find it rather appalling that people whom seem to be 'eye candy' (male/female) get way more upvotes and interaction than those that aren't. To me this seems like a severe disadvantage.
While somebody that has great value to bring to the site may not get exposure, some 'eye candy' could bring no value to the site and capitalize.
Seems to go against the grain for the SteemIT ecosystem.
Thanks @sreepyeldarb, I appreciate your feedback.
As for controlling what other vote for.... There's not much anyone can do about that. Voting is a very subjective topic, and what works for some, doesn't work for others.
Steemit is still growing, and growing fast. I don't have the "eye candy" factor, as you put it, so I don't worry about that. I post what I want to talk about, or share, and those who like my content will upvote and follow me. Those that don't, won't. I don't mind that at all.
Concentrate on what you're doing and don't get caught up on posts that you feel don't deserve to get votes. You'll find your niche, and those interested in what you have to say will follow you, and then the votes will come.