I downvoted the post not because I disagree with the post or think it isn't a quality post but because I do not think that the interests of Steem are served by every platform or devteam update pulling thousands of dollars from the reward pools that go to ordinary users. The reward consensus algorithm also disproportionately rewards these posts since they are the only thing that 100% of Steem users have in common (aside from being human, etc.).

Also, a bit of feedback. I understand that it is a rhetorical technique but using loaded terms like good and evil will tend to be seen as attempting to marginalize people who hold a different point of view about what is best. I would suggest using more specific, descriptive, and objective terms to describe behaviors you believe should be encouraged or discouraged and leave the moralistic labeling out of it.