I'd mentioned in a post earlier as well that downflagging could perhaps have options - like when you click the flag on someone's post, a multiple choice table could pop up asking you why you've downflagged it. For small things such as disagreeing on what the person is saying, the flag should only count a fraction of the voting power? maybe. Whereas if it's because of plagiarised content, stolen ID, scamming or such, the issue could be sent to an admin or moderator to check out how legit and reasonable the flag is before full voting power is applied. This could be sorted out by the general community as well. mmm, good that we're onto this topic anyway. Throwing out some ideas.