I am pleasantly surprised that some few voters appreciate the information. I expected this blog post to be either heavily downvoted (flagged) or ignored. I don’t expect the post to obtain sufficient ranking and thus most readers will probably not see it. I’d prefer more readers (not only for my earnings) so more eyeballs to point out any mistakes in my analysis. Considerable peer review was done already in the discussion at BCT, but some here might have a unique perspective to add.

Just because it's not voted / flagged , does not mean people don't see it. They probably need time to digest the information or they don't see it as crucial information so they choose to ignore it. Not to mention that a lot of them did not understand half of it.

As far as i understood, there were a lot of changes since the original launch , changes that were not added to the docs and they do say at some point

Disclaimer

Any numbers or equations presented above are notional and may contain errors. The actual rewards are defined the by the open source software. It is your responsibility to review the code or hire someone to review it for you.

....which i tend to apply to everything related to rewards, shares, % on steemit as the platform continuously adapts to new needs/content/users.