It is funny. I planned to edit this comment saying that I shared your opinion, but little by little, every time I have been reading more.

I realized that no. For the first time I thought I was going to read a realistic thought about Steemit. But.

Deep down, when you talk about sharing a mission, you keep talking about the same. That is the same opinion as that of "the Steemit community" so far.

I don't see anything new in your opinion / criticism.

Let's be realistic.

Steemit is killed by Steemit's own users, they are the first to use the platform 100% unnaturally and only talk about the same. About Steem, cryptocurrencies and Steemit.

That is of the little content that really receives important payments, from the witnees themselves and people of power.

In summary. Basically, people of power vote for themselves.

This attitude is supposed to be. An attitude, what is absolutely contradictory to Steemit's principles?

Wait. Thats not all. Those same people are the creators of most bots themselves, who vote for them too.

That to close the circle.

Yes. Steemit has fallen into the spiral of selfishness.

And that's not all. There's still more.

Selfishness does not only lead to that. If not, it also leads them to centralize the content of the platform under their own subrealist labels.

All invented.

They leave hardly any opportunity, neither in receiving payments, nor in giving visibility to publications that are outside their invented labels; and if you use realistic tags, you are directly absolutely excluded from the game. Steemit's

Because they will take care of that.

If there are participatory people in Steemit. Those people will drag sooner or later towards the people who are deconstructing Steemit with their subrealist organization by leaps and bounds.

Obviously. Participatory people do not meet with curators because they have something in common.

They just get together because they get paid. End of story.

There are complete communities that have and have destroyed more and more themes within Steemit, for the simple reason of wishing to group them all within the same labels.

These practices of the "false communities of healing" together with the lack of flexibility; to be able to open your eyes and be able to really unify the themes of publications naturally.

It is what has destroyed and will continue to destroy Steemit.

Because it is impossible for a "community" of farmers, photographs, programmers, selfie models, scientists and waiters; live together.

That is learned in nature; It is pure logic.

It is meant not to be durable, it is impossible for it to grow exponentially, there is absolutely nothing in common.

They simply mix their varied daily trash to collect their salary, without analyzing what they cure.

Always healing the same shit about "Hello, I'm new" posts and more and more posts from their own users, of your trails, of your users with more power.

They are closed cycles of friendships without any sense.

There is no desire to generate community, or have something in common.

No attempt is made to group people into specific issues in common; and the rest of the people are stepped on so that they cannot do it (through dirtying the content labels).

Personally. Enter Steemit to find people with pleasure in common with me, and know if I could create my blog on technology thematics here inside.

What is the problem?
It's basically impossible to talk to anyone in here.

People come to what is coming and they leave; and I can understand that attitude of people who generate spectacular content. But of the people who draw a drawing..

It is impossible to know if anyone is interested in something. Because there is only selfishness everywhere, it is impossible to share opinions, tastes, thoughts.

That happens. On the platform, and in the one hundred thousand groups of discord that exist.

People have the same behavior.

It's fun. Because if you talk to them, in reality, you will find many more hobbies or common themes.

The problem is that they publish exclusively on what they get paid. Or they publish anything, due to the need to want to publish daily (I myself have fallen into that attitude).

The key is naturalness.

Neither the curators nor the users. They are using Steemit naturally (in the vast majority of cases) And those who do. They are invited, encouraged and provoked not to do so. From all points of view.

They encourage you not to publish what you like. They encourage you not to talk to people who have your same tastes. That would be the most normal. But not, that is not the reality of Steemit.

They must maintain the platform for others to use, not to exploit it themselves. That should have been the idea.

Until they realize that, it is impossible for Steemit to grow. Because nobody will want to enter here, if the content is not drastically modified.

Obviously. With Bots, with trails of hundreds of inactive users, with pointless subrealist healing projects that mix 100 themes into 1 single label. And more. And more. And more. Etc..

With all that. It is impossible to see Steemit grow.

The faithful reflection of the poque is impossible to rebuild Steemit are the new communities.

They have already shattered. Literally. Generating communities with names of healing projects, instead of "logical and natural" thematic names.

There you have the faithful reflection of the formula and the thought that works on Steemit.

Pure selfishness, without thinking of the user at all.

In 2 days, they have managed to have the section of communities full of MIERDA. Literally.

It was not enough to have the tags full of shit everywhere. That they have destroyed the new platform project, in less than 2 days.

You see it. The leaders of the Steemit communities are absolute cracks.

They just need to throw up the selfishness that invades them and start thinking with the brain from time to time.

I don't think they will die for that, even if it's only 1 day a week.

Nothing happens if they do. I think.....