You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: ⚙ Introducing Beem Boost Service 🥳
After the EIP changes of HF 21 / 22 @steembeem / @aro.steem, this service will almost certainly draw a lot of uhhh ... "attention." And very unlikely that it will be favorable ...
You are, of course, free to do as you wish, but you may want to reconsider.
P.S. Stopping by, in response to the wallet memo you just sent ...
Thanks for your note, what do you suggest in further, Best!
No problem @aro.steem. On this …
… anything where you are supporting our Steem blockchain through something other than an upvote buying service. That will almost certainly draw a lot of downvotes. Which, at a minimum will reduce its value, if not rendering it useless …
#sbi-skip
The same could be said for SBI and other delegation s for upvotes too.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Yes, understood @contrabourdon. I obviously have both utilized this in the past and view it slightly differently, given the help many of our Steem blockchain’s “little people” have received from it, through the gifts of others.
Personally, I have been steadily “skipping” receipt (requires the manual insert of the code shown below) of an SBI upvote myself, except for my unfortunate miss on the comment above …
#sbi-skip
At least SBI is actively patrolled for abuse and the nomination process acts as a first stage filter.
Yes, very good @joshman. I certainly agree and appreciate the words of support on this topic.
No doubt I am biased, but I do view SBI as a lot more than a bidbot service, e.g. booster. For one thing, the principal is a long way from profiting from his program, unlike the owners of the typical bidbot service ...
Thanks! 😊 👍
#sbi-skip
Haha. Yes you got a good upvote for that comment. It was ok though 😉 @qurator also has a subscription service similar to this, albeit for whitelisted members. Given the current voting power of @steembeem, the upvotes would only bring it to the dust threshold anyway.
Posted using Partiko iOS