You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Antidote To The Steemit Complain Game - Lessons In Winning From A Five Year Old

in #steem8 years ago (edited)

The A-level quote is the same kind of nonsense populist media spews.

Comparing a Math Olympiad test with public education makes absolutely no sense.

When exams were more difficult in the 50s-70s there were far greater rates of failure, and expulsion from the education system.

Is this what you want to revert to?

A system in which people are "priced out" of certain industries by not being able to possess certain qualifications, due to single instances of bad performance in stress-based conditions?

I agree that complaining is ineffective.

But it's fuelled by articles such as thi that aim to depict newbies as incompetent for not making money.

"Oh just create more captivating content" - "Earn it!!!"

No. Instead guides should teach them how voting works.

How networking governs voting power, and how 100 votes can equal < $10.

Hence it's about cultivating important connections, or being tied to an enormous botnet.

I hope newbies aren't frustrated and understand that yes, you are playing a game you probably don't know the rules to, and will struggle to win unless you adapt your strategy.

(I wrote a post on how to avoid frustration, I won't link it, because I don't want to spam, but I recommend it).

Sort:  

Your comments suggest you either didn't read or understand the post

Cg

Typical, can't rebut anything so claim I misunderstand.

Hint: Education was more selective before. Compare with public school in China you'll see highest performing schools are highly selective (by failing those who lag), and more inclusive schools aren't so brilliant.

And the 11 year old Chinese kid thing was related to Math Olympiads.

There is guides that show how voting works when I was a noob I looked for them

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 60445.30
ETH 2331.01
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.52