You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit, Inc Supports 0.8.3
Those 159 accounts are, even when you substract the a) b) and c)s, >10% of the active userbase. How would you define significant?
Bots get more with the new algo because they curate more. The only reason they're not getting much with the old algo is their smaller stake in single accounts. The same reason all the minnows lose with the way that's been decided, no matter how hard they worked.
Sort: Trending
[-]
smooth (70) 8 years ago (edited)
- You don't know what is what percentage of the active user base, because you can not accurately count a, b, or c. People have sock puppets, multiple accounts, etc. Likewise for the active user base.
- If we accept your 10% number than you have discarded 90% of the userbase. I find that next to useless for a change that was suggested to address a problem where many active new users (recruited from outside the crypto/Bitshares/etc. communities) will receive nothing from the July 4 megareward and quit. That's why I would like to address it with a broader-based promotional fund that reaches more than (possibly) 10%.
- Minnows don't really lose in either case, they get next to nothing or in some cases literally nothing (because rewards round down to zero) with both algorithms.