RE: A new approach to Content Reward Allocation
There is a lot information left on blockchain to make prediction. Who voted for whom in the past. Top 50 payouts. Just username is enough to predict. How could we hide reputation of the person?
The more info we hide, the less interesting it becomes to average people. People starting to use bots, because they wanting leverage their knowledge, so knowledge should be public for everyone to leverage.
For bots having same voting strategy is not profitable, it's encourage people to invent more sophisticated algorithms and it's good.
Why people perceive that if @dan recives 10 votes in first minute as wrong thing with a system? For me it is perfectly right. He has reputation and system fast and correctly measures it. There is no problem with that for sure.
Is it problem that first voters make profits? Make vote allocation linear? We could do it anytime, but they do work of measuring reputation, they should be compensated then! Is is useful, we could take post like this and filter them and put in "reputation" category or something. Top ten reputable post! Public information is useful for everyone.
Well said. We shouldn't hide things or make them overly complicated. Average people need to believe they can come in here and make money, even if they're just voters and not writers. Keep it simple & transparent, but go ahead and mess with that algorithm as much as needed.