Best curators of the week [2017-07-01]
Congratulations to @s4s as the best curator of the week on STEEM network! I thought my script gone crazy and returned wrong results, but quick check on steemit.com shows that @s4s earned 728.278 SP this week, while account balance 1,331.543 SP.
@coinkorea has delivered some amazings result as well.
I think this is HF19 anomalies and their results are not sustainable. If you considering curator for trail, then better choose from @steemtrail or @biophil - they delivering stable results week after week.
| Rank | Curator | Profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | @s4s | 57.81% |
| 2 | @coinkorea | 22.79% |
| 3 | @barbro | 1.70% |
| 4 | @rhdmsdl0322 | 1.70% |
| 5 | @alcibiades | 1.29% |
| 6 | @minions8282 | 1.25% |
| 7 | @yoring223 | 1.25% |
| 8 | @steemtrail | 1.18% |
| 9 | @jtt0532m | 1.14% |
| 10 | @biophil | 1.03% |
| 11 | @allpass | 0.97% |
| 12 | @qhaltpal | 0.96% |
| 13 | @cherish5528 | 0.92% |
| 14 | @mata | 0.88% |
| 15 | @teofilex11 | 0.86% |
| 16 | @aizensou | 0.83% |
| 17 | @typeautoer | 0.83% |
| 18 | @kb720k | 0.82% |
| 19 | @gkfmxm077 | 0.82% |
| 20 | @handsolo | 0.81% |
Raw JSON
[
{
"_id": "s4s",
"profit": 0.5780591200646029,
"rank": 1
},
{
"_id": "coinkorea",
"profit": 0.22786161105160374,
"rank": 2
},
{
"_id": "barbro",
"profit": 0.017021183355953342,
"rank": 3
},
{
"_id": "rhdmsdl0322",
"profit": 0.016972758887941333,
"rank": 4
},
{
"_id": "alcibiades",
"profit": 0.012908690701999395,
"rank": 5
},
{
"_id": "minions8282",
"profit": 0.012502080766966676,
"rank": 6
},
{
"_id": "yoring223",
"profit": 0.012501228916043636,
"rank": 7
},
{
"_id": "steemtrail",
"profit": 0.011812745048227938,
"rank": 8
},
{
"_id": "jtt0532m",
"profit": 0.011357642303446535,
"rank": 9
},
{
"_id": "biophil",
"profit": 0.01025967561046651,
"rank": 10
},
{
"_id": "allpass",
"profit": 0.009734213757501844,
"rank": 11
},
{
"_id": "qhaltpal",
"profit": 0.009599962319493961,
"rank": 12
},
{
"_id": "cherish5528",
"profit": 0.009212427396882002,
"rank": 13
},
{
"_id": "mata",
"profit": 0.008824954803309467,
"rank": 14
},
{
"_id": "teofilex11",
"profit": 0.008573908612502342,
"rank": 15
},
{
"_id": "aizensou",
"profit": 0.008341961755471678,
"rank": 16
},
{
"_id": "typeautoer",
"profit": 0.008324809683933702,
"rank": 17
},
{
"_id": "kb720k",
"profit": 0.008242623415409784,
"rank": 18
},
{
"_id": "gkfmxm077",
"profit": 0.008171086097750878,
"rank": 19
},
{
"_id": "handsolo",
"profit": 0.008108971432192318,
"rank": 20
}
]
This chart is build using SteemData and would not be possible without amazing work of @furion.
Previous Best Curators Posts
https://steemit.com/steem/@pal/best-curators-of-the-week-2017-06-24
https://steemit.com/steem/@pal/best-curators-of-the-week-2017-06-18
considering @s4s has only been on here a few weeks, has made no posts or comments, would it be right to say that this is a bot that has been designed to reap curation rewards.
I say it is a pity that Steemit is getting taken over by bots. As a social media, Steemit will need to clean up the bots?
Well done to all of them!
Thank you for sharing this information! Resteemed
Thank you! Some of them doing real good job. Honestly I wanna know @s4s secret, it is not luck, he is voted on profitable post during whole week deliberately.
I missed this earlier, but I'll tell you the secret - delegated SP :) So while making this list, be sure to divide curation rewards by owned SP + delegated SP.
PS: Oh ok - maybe it does, but the delegation was removed before you made this post?
I'm doing that. That is why I publishing results, because I couldn't find resource that gives list of curators who producing stable results in their curation activity. Steemwahles top curators list are broken
Yes, I think this is the case. But still, during this week he produced around 8% gains. Which is still huge for curator. Fresh results: https://steemit.com/steem/@pal/best-curators-of-the-week-2017-07-09
P.S. Glad that you're in the top list again. #9 is astonishing result!
Me too - he seems pretty new here.
He's probably part of some group. Anyway, interesting data you got
well done guys, this is an encouraging chart here. please kindly give back to the community. no hard feelings meant. thank you in doing so
They already give a lot of value to community by curating effectively. They vote for others, not for themselves.
wow, that is really impressive then. kudos to them
Well done to all of them! Hope soon my name will be mention in this kind of lists!
I guess @s4s had delegated SP, which are now removed ...
Yes, I think this is what happened with @coinkorea too.
it looks like a good thing that ther are poeple looking for soild content ,they also need to put a lot of time in to find them. gratulation to them
Yes, community before not praised curators, but now things should be different.
Ohom
they Every Time Vote For Other Not For Them Selves
Wish that my name will be posted too but maybe takes years ..congrats everyone :)
I hope it does not take so long ;-)
Thank you for voting.^^
good post ❤❤❤ I m follower you!!! @pal