You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives
The question is, how hosting private keys would be solved? If http://geekinprison.com/ will integrate comments, then to be able to comment there I would have to:
a) register new account through his website - but then I will have a trouble to gain significant SteemPower there, and.. only author of blog would have a significant impact for rewards of new guys
b) share my posting key with potentially not trusted webstie
What we need is SteemConnect on steroids - decentralize solution, what I believe is very challenging if even possible.
For sure a possibility of having multiple posting keys would be helpful. Compromising one posting key, should not have impact for main posting key.
Hi @noisy - the question is touched on in one of the comment threads above (including a reply from Dan). Multiple posting keys seems to be the direction it would head. I share exactly the same concerns as you do though!
I just figure out that from user perspective, dealing with keys is already something difficult and new, and introducing even more keys could be really confusing.
I believe this could work, that user should be able create new "slaves" account and link them to original account (via steem connect or steemit). Then user would have a possibility of setting a rule for particular slave account (behind a scane of course additional keys would be used). Then blockchain after noticing any action from slave account should trigger proper action on main account, of course after checking whether permissions of particular slave account allows to take particular action.
This will allow keeping slave keys by each service individually (ideally not even by them, but by browser).
What do you think?
It's a good suggestion. I agree 100% that whatever solution they implement, it is probably going to complicate things! I hope they can come up with a good solution that strikes the right balance.