Actually, I believe you are the first person to do this, at least publicly. I read either one of @Dan or @Ned 's threads, or it was in the White Paper maybe even, where it said that they do discourage the use of Bots, but that a Bot that could actually add something to the site wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. And wherever I read that, the example they gave was that a closest a Bot would probably get is to upvote people who have already gotten upvotes on posts. This seems to be much more sophisticated than that. And eventually you could maybe even make a Bot that reads. Not saying that this is going to happen tomorrow or anything, but they are already making things like a program that runs on a robot that allows it to watch 600 hours of Situational Comedy (SitCom) Television, and then be able to start guessing what will happen next. And one robot, maybe even the same one, wrote a Sci-Fi story after watching a bunch of Sci-Fi, and some semi-well known people thought it was good enough to make into a real short film and star in it. So Bots aren't always "auto-upvote everything" type things, they can actually add value.