You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem Developer Update (Graphene 2.0)
Excellent! Is there anything we can do as a community to help test? Also curious of your thoughts about posts like this earning rewards. I'd like it to be voted up for visibility, but paying steemitblog from the reward pool seems odd given how much steem the organization behind steemit currently has.
IMO they totally deserve that ;)
It would be great feature to be able to redirect steem rewards from posts with one input box during publication. Then... it would be possible to donate everything to @null .
I thought the last fork release had a mechanism to have non-paying posts? That would be better than decreasing the reward pool for everyone else and distributing to null, IMO.
I agree, those developing this should be hansomely rewarded, but there's just so much criticism out there already that forgoing more payouts would go a long way from a PR perspective. They gain so much new STEEM via share dilution protection due to their massive VEST holdings that they have plenty to last them a very long time. If they don't distribute it well, they will be stuck holding a super majority of something with far kess value than it could have had. Just my opinion.
Maybe vote with reduced power? A post with 400+ votes will still be visible regardless of payout I believe
I don't think votes count alone matters. The strength of the vote in terms of VESTS is what's important, as far as I know.