You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Deleted
Agreed. I've been reading through Dan's comments, and he didn't say all that much, so this post was speaking volumes at the time it was published. As I said in reply to @kafkanarchy84: It's just a theory.
@full-steem-ahead: here's the refutation you mentioned wanting to see.
Your link for refutation is bad. Is it appears to be a link to a comment in this article, is that right Luke?
Yes, I was linking to your comment about not seeing a refutation from @sneak while replying to his refutation. Make sense?
If my current confusion is cleared up by you informing me that @jianjolly == sneak then kewlness, otherwise I'm still confused.
Maybe this will help. If you see something different, that would be odd.