You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 50/50 curation and bots getting more?

in #steem6 years ago (edited)

Let stake be 'locked' up via a switch so that it cannot vote but automatically takes 10x 100% vote values from the pool each day at the 2.4 hr maximum rate.

Hehe. Thats a very bold idea. :)
The problem with this is that most people would opt for it.

From your posts ive read you seem like an extremely positive guy.
Im not. haha.
Because youre very positive is why i think you are supportive of the 50/50 split.
Im the type of person that thinks that assholes tend to continue acting like assholes and the decent people need no incentive to be decent and they will continue to be decent no matter what it costs them.

"Incentives" for me are just another word for:

Pay me not to be an asshole.

haha.

As much as your idea is innovative i just think that most people would just opt for it and those that dont would grab at anyone that is left to give them votes.
I mean just ask yourself:

Would we even be discussing this problem if so many people werent selfish assholes?

Im sorry i have to be blunt like this but thats what it boils down to.
hehe

Sort:  

I would want them to opt for it because, there are people here that recognize that attention is the name of the future game and at the moment, it isn't possible to influence because of people selling and, nothing really changes for values. Once they are out of the pool and not selling, people can't buy and those who want to curate actively will have real effect with low amounts. eventually, vying for the attention will bring some people back from the 100% stake to influence the system. Your stake is your voice, take the silent stake that influences content blindly, out of the game.

I would want them to opt for it.

Hmm. So this could basically be called "The Haejin proposal". :D

I mean it makes sense. You get the ROI but dont defile the #pages.
The problem i see is big investors that have a large vote to share would all opt to getting the daily 10X and the community would be sharing dimes..

Im more for cuting the author earnings with the DAO to fund the projects. That would have a much greater positive effect.

The problem i see is big investors that have a large vote to share would all opt to getting the daily 10X and the community would be sharing dimes..

Most are doing that now, right? The ones that aren't will recognise the power that comes with being able to affect trending on a daily basis - their favourite Dapps and authors pushed into real visibility

Im more for cuting the author earnings with the DAO to fund the projects.

This is more likely to happen then the stake... at the moment ;D

It is fun though isn't? This Steem thing?

Funny? Yeah.
Id agree with you there. Hehe.

Actually I think im getting close to giving up and just relocating to another account while adjusting to "the funny". 😁

At what point does it no longer matter what you say but rather how much the voters like what you say.

lost about 70% of my total votes over this 50/50 nonsense.
Haha. Id be pissed if i werent earning 5 dollars per post.

Ill see you around.

honestly, i hope at least something happens. Even if it turns out a complete failure.

😁

Posted using Partiko Android

Dumb dilution. Yeah in my opinion there's no point in coding this because it's already available. Have at it, Farmers!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.15
TRX 0.17
JST 0.028
BTC 68748.32
ETH 2464.48
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.36