You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Stake-weighted voting is a neo-fascist abomination: anti-liberty, anti-equality, anti-humanity

in #steem6 years ago

True. but it would only affect 0.1% of the accounts:

https://steempeak.com/steem/@preparedwombat/how-much-steem-power-does-it-take-to-be-in-the-top-10-of-accounts-the-top-5-the-top-1

What surprised be on this Article: I am well in the top 5% of all account and yet still feel totally insignificant.

Sort:  

It's not a matter of how many accounts it'll affect, but what proportion of Steem holdings it would affect. I'm willing to bet top 0.1% holds an obscene supermajority of Steem Power.

Of course they do.

That's why i agree that √x sub-linear won't cut it and I think that only 1-e⁻ˣ sub-linear could potentially fix stuff because is has a maximum power level. Once you approach that maximum it becomes effectively one account one vote.

The trick would be to set that maximum low enough so that there are enough user with a maximum / full vote – Current Dolphin perhaps. Or even lower.

But this is all mute. The top 20 will never agree to curtail there own power that much.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 54681.92
ETH 2286.50
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.29