RE: Distributing Wealth Should Be Equally Profitable
I believe voting power should be equal for every Steemian. Its not right for the whales to have all the power to decide who has the best or worst posts. It should be up to the Steemian community as a whole to decide what is good and what is bad. Not just a few whales. The way it is set up now is actually not good for the Steemit community. I want to know what the Steemit community thinks is the best or worst content. Not what the opinion of a few Steem whales think is good or bad content. It seems to go against what I believe Steemit is all about. Decentralization and non censorship. The way it is set up now as far as voting power goes it is totally centralize to a few Steem whales. And with voting power being centralized it allows a few Steemit whale to have the power to sensor what they think is good content and what is bad content. So basically if a Steemit whale decides that the post is not up vote worthy then the post never gets seen or noticed by the Steemit community as a whole. Centralized voting power = Censorship = bad for Steemit and bad for Steemit community.
I think stake is one of the only real measures of identity. It's easy to trick and exploit creating a flood of accounts, which defeats the entire purpose of giving one person one vote, since there are economic incentives for doing so. I think your definition of censorship is too loose by the way.. as nothing is censored on the chain.
Thanks for make this matter clear .
no problem @jayed007 thanks for your input.
You are always welcome : )