RE: How steemit is becoming like youtube instead of reddit
The system probably needs to focus more on rewarding quality bloggers (blogs) over rewarding single content. Should center more around crediting the blog account for number of subscriptions, kind of like Utube subscriptions. However In this case the blogger would received an automatic number of (weekly??) up votes based on the number of subscribers and the SteemPower that those subscribers hold.
The second thing is that there should be a more granular system of up- voting.....something like High, Medium, Low. This will insure that the up votes apply more appropriately. Right now the up votes are binary. Ether you get the vote or you don't. However quality content is judged on a number of varying perimeters. ie.... the quality of information provided, the time and effort invested, the intent of the blogger. Therefore curators should have the ability to award, for example 25%, 50%, or 100% of a vote. This will help to more equitably and precisely allocate the organizations resources.
All that said. Steemit management is an A class team. I'm sure they are working on some excellent solutions.
@xyrzbest I really enjoyed this article, it was very honest and highly underrated. Upvoted!
@james212 I could not agree more, I fear that for every amazing success story we may have dozens of people who feel slighted and we may end up with more negative publicity, than positive if this is not corrected soon. Also I would like to see more rewards to commenters, on other sites, many people only read the headlines and then scroll to the bottom to read all the funny comments, which they consider to be better than the professionally written news articles.