You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Can we have downvotes and at the same time prevent 'flag wars'?
I'm simply afraid, that abusers will outnumber those who are trying to fight with abuse.
I think the mentioned (or an additional?) 'committee' account with enough delegated SP from Steemit, Inc. would be able to successfully combat abuse.
I think your idea is very centralized (even more than mine) and conflicts with my ideal of censorship resistance.
Concerning Discord, I am using it but don't have much time for chatting. I will join your channel, but please don't expect too much ... :)
Dear @jaki01
i agree. it's very centralized. however downvotes already has been proved to create more tension, dramma, killing userbase and it's simply not working.
I've few good friends, who are right now "milking steem" like crazy. And when I asked them if they aren't worried to be downvoted - I received interesting answer: flaggers will get bored sooner or later.
That's the problem. Those who abuse system, they go "quiet" for several days after been downvoted and then they are coming back. Perhaps unnoticed. Or they simply carry on, knowing that they will win at the end of the day.
@ haejin is great example.
@haejin has no chance on HIVE ...
If persistent 'farmers' got flagged automatically, then they soon might stop having fun here. :)