You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Proposed Changes & Curation Rewards
The organic process appears to be working so let's not make major changes at this point in time.
Does it mean the content award allocation proposal is not going to be implemented after all?
For me it's quite disappointing that no matter if you operate a bot or do it manually, currently the best strategy is to upvote any post made by a whale without reading it. As a result the above post by Dan got $2k after a couple of minutes, whereas an alternative post by james-show on the same subject got $0.12. For me this is clearly not a sign that "the organic process is working", quite the opposite.
Yes. It appears all of that attempted fairness was thrown out.
That proposal made $2600, and was completely scrapped in favor of not protecting the users from bots at all.
Seems like curation works perfectly ;-)
I didn't vote for james' post because the change he proposed is only doable with major changes to steem. That's not something to be done in a couple of days, and the problem doesn't show to be so big to dedicate a huge amount of time for it. There's more important things to work on.
Dan's post lines out that they actually thought about what the problem really is, and what can be done to improve the distribution between posts. A set of small changes, which will smooth out some of the current edges.