Hey, @bashadow.

Can't disagree with any of what you've said. We're definitely heading down the same road on this one. Everyone just needs to get along, because we're all needed in one way or another.

There are some actions on STEEM that does not help it, but in the final analysis, I don't think the majority of us are participating in any one of those things to cause damage. But the incessant perception that it is an issue will do more damage than the actual thing itself.

So, somewhere between harping on everything and cheering on everything is probably the place to be. STEEM needs to get its act together, but it still an amazing place filled with a lot of good things and people. I'm kind of glad I've had an opportunity to be around when its still lightly used compared to how many have signed up and how many more we're hoping will.

You and me then. We can go back and turn out that light together, if something better finally comes along. My problem is, if this doesn't work out, I'm not sure better shows up, because blockchain governance, from EOS to Libra, seems to be heading towards some form of centralization. And maybe that's what people want, but getting beyond a potentially safe environment on a social media site doesn't get us to a bootstrapped global digital economy, and transparency, and censorship proof, and free, and autonomous.