You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Some Thoughts on Steemit
Perfectly understandable.
I don't either.
The people who make the rules...who write the code..
think differently than we do
They're PROGRAMMERS...a different breed.
They don't speak the same language that we do.
When they use words that we think we know what they mean.
they don't.
So..the best you can do is the best you can do.
Don't Sweat the Petty Stuff
and
Don't pet the sweaty stuff
Steem ON!
You're no fun!
LOL
The programmers don't control Steemit. They work for those that do.
There are 39 accounts that own 93% of the Steem in the world, and the devs work to satisfy that market.
The fact that Steem is increasingly concentrated at an accelerating rate in those accounts shows the devs are doing a good job.
You are quite inspirational. I have somewhat emulated your model, although I post less. Your refusal to buy votes, or self-vote, remain startling examples of integrity, even though you clearly are willing to work hard to attain to rewards.
I have only seen you self-vote but rarely, maybe twice. Given your interest in rewards, your integrity is extremely admirable, and your success shows that neither bots, nor self-votes, are required to succeed on Steemit.
Thanks very much for your example.
I hope you are having the best Christmas of your life, right now!
I self vote strategically.
quite a lot actually
you must have missed it.
not comments though
that would not be strategic
according to my master plan.
I do spend my attention around the place a lot. I probably miss more of your posts than I see.
me too
I've seen you around
my (current) strategy is to vote (at a variable power) for anything I like.
then when It comes time to shut 'er down (for a while)
I use what's left of my vote power (above a variable percent)
on myself.
if your vote power EVER reaches %100 that means you're wasting it.
that's a sin.