You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: MY THOUGHTS ON THE JS/WITNESS MEETING & OPEN QUESTION: "What is safer, Witness Votes Based on Stake, Or One Man One Vote?"
what do you think about us having less votes, say 15. I hear manu people talk about that option.. Im not sure, but i lean toward it.. and 30 is too much anyways really.. you end up just voting everyone almost which isnt much use is it?
It takes about 3/4 of the consensus witnesses to form the actual consensus so I believe going with anywhere between 10 and 12 votes would be ideal. That way no one account can ever dictate the entire roster.
ahh YES! that makes GOod sense..
were on 10 witness now.. so it sounds like we need more like 16 to do anything>?
I believe the math settles on 15 but I don't have the calculation.