Rating of the posts who called djimirji. Period 9.8.2018-11.8.2018
Good day to all.
Received SBD or STEEM from this post will be shared between the posts that have fallen into the ranking among the authors who upvote this post
I present you the rating of users who successfully called my bot.
Reminder: You can get a free UpVote from me. For this it is enough to subscribe to me @djimirji and in the comments to your post specify text @djimirji up!
I will clarify the formula of the rating a little, I would like to upgrade it somehow, maybe you will have suggestions on how to do this.
Now I analyze 4 components:
| Parameter | Influence of % |
|---|---|
| Comments | 16 |
| The length of the post (the number of characters) | 18 |
| Number of rshares received not from bots | 50 |
| Author reputation | 16 |
It is clear that we can not eliminate all the bots that voted, but I think there is not a big error here.
| № | Author | Post | Parrots ) | Upvote % | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  @mysearchisover | Harfork 20 - Bad For Steem? - 215 | 0.17203 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 |  @mysearchisover | $1 Steem - 214 | 0.16856 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 |  @martusamak | O Cortejo da Queima das Fitas (de Coimbra) em Imagens | 0.14546 | 0 | 0 |
The post from which take the reward Rating of the posts who called djimirji. Period 1.8.2018-3.8.2018.
Total reward gained by post: рost did not gain awards for sharing
Total shared reward: **0 **
During the period from 9 August 2018 to 11 August 2018 the bot voted for 16 posts.
The rating includes 7% of posts for the period, but not less than 3 posts.
I would like to hear from you, what parameters and how much in your opinion they should influence the rating. All the same, getting the robot to determine the quality of content is not an easy task.
@originalworks
