Draft Letter To Steemit Admin/UI Developer - Add New UI Component Tax Basis Log with export cvs function. (See Content For Other Possible Requests) CPA/Tax Attorney Opinions Particularly Welcome

in #steem8 years ago (edited)

On my first day here I made a post about the tax implications of being on Steemit.

As a result of that post, @dana-edwards and I got into a long conversation about those tax implications. In the end, we agreed that although there is a ton of room for debate on what the tax implications of Steemit activity are exactly, there was something very straight forward about Steemit that would be helpful to have changed.

The fiat currency equivalent values all over the platform should be removed and replaced with values in Steem, Steem Dollars and Steem Power.

I told @dana-edwards I would draft a community letter and submit it for edits and opinions. If there is a consensus on this issue after reading the letter, than we could submit it officially in the hopes of making this change.

In the meantime I plan on having zero issues with taxes, so when my first post is vests in about 2 days - you better believe I'm going to be writing down the details.

Read the letter and leave comments or edits in the comment section

Edit 2 - One user pointed out that Steemit has no admin to address this letter to. Nonetheless, someone built the UI and presumably someone can change it. Who is that person?

Edit 3 - I understand that there are a number of people who see preparing for, or even agreeing, to pay taxes on Steem as anathema to the idea of Steem and virtual currency in the first place. I'll make a seperate post on that matter at some point, but for now let me just say this: Whether you believe in the validity of the of the IRS and its taxation power or not, at the end of the day they will come knocking for their money. This is just a means of A) preparing to argue how/what money should be paid and B) making it easier to pay when/if we are required to. And make no mistake, the IRS can require payment, whether you believe in it or not.

Edit 4: One CPA/Tax Attorney has already commented on the letter, and based on that comment it appears that removing currency equivalency might be a bad idea and the die may already be cast on steem as income notion. Looking for other attorneys/CPAs to chime in.

Edit 5: @samupaha makes a great point in the comments which I hadn't considered- if steem dollars don't hold to their peg of the dollar - which they have not - then many of these posts are going to be even more complicated to measure the tax basis on. Perhaps the removal of steem dollars should also be requested?

Edit 8: OK, so here are my thoughts - It seems - based on @sean-kings comment here, some of the content @dana-edwards post here, that there really isn't any question about whether steem is income. It seems like fighting that battle would be fruitless.

I don't know enough about the issue @samupaha raised about getting rid of steem dollars to come to conclusion about it one way or another, however in @samupaha's post here he argues for exactly that result and apparently @ned resteemed it. So this is already on the radar to some degree and I think it muddies the waters here.

The one thing that at least now a couple of CPAs seem not to totally disagree with is the notion that there should be better historical recording of Fair market value for tax basis purposes. This information is readily available on the block chain and adding a tax basis log would achieve this goal very well. With this in mind, I'm going to reedit the letter to ask for that exclusively. Thoughts?


Edit 6: Dear @ned

# Edit 7 - Possible Requests:

We are writing this joint letter in order to request that a simple UI addition be created - a tax basis log - which would collect in one place a users vested posts/comments along with the tax basis of those posts in fiat currency and the time/day those posts vested. We are also adding that the log include an "export:csv" feature.

1. That all references to the "cash value" of Steem, Steem Dollars and Steem Power be removed from the Steemit UI and replaced with their actual value in Steem, Steem Dollars and Steem Power. (Perhaps not a good idea)
1. That the steem dollar be eliminated from the blockchain as it has long since stopped pegging to the dollar and in calculating taxes will simply amount to a confusion multiplier

## We are making this request because the current system misrepresents, in a way detrimental to the Steemit community, the value and ease of conversion of Steem into a fiat currency.

Currently, the IRS's position on the taxation of cryptocurrency is fairly clear. The IRS has so far released two notices which address the cryptocurrency issue.

In Notice IR-2014-36, the IRS makes clear that virtual currency is treated as property for tax purposes. If you purchase virtual currency, the tax basis would be the price you paid for it, and you would eventually be taxed on any profits from the sale of the currency.

However, in IR-2014-36 the IRS also indicates that virtual currency received as a payment to an independent contractor is taxable at self-employment rates.

In the accompanying notice, 2014-21, the IRS defines "convertible" virtual currency as "currency that has an equivalent value in real currency, or that acts as a substitute for real currency."

The IRS goes on to state the following:

A taxpayer who receives virtual currency as payment for goods or services
must, in computing gross income, include the fair market value of the virtual currency,
measured in U.S. dollars, as of the date that the virtual currency was received

Receiving a virtual currency from mining it is also taxed as income for the tax year within which it was mined:

when a taxpayer successfully “mines” virtual currency, the fair market value
of the virtual currency as of the date of receipt is includible in gross income

The implications of these notices are very serious.

If taken at face value, This notice requires every steemit account holder to keep a meticulous record of their vesting Steem income, on every single post and comment, as of the 7 day mark when that Steem incomes vests to them.

Needless to say, the IRS has not formulated a complete or final position on virtual currency, and has been asking for comment since 2014. As a result, there are many elements of this notice which bring into question its relevance to Steem, including:

* Steemit members are not mining the block chain directly.
* Steemit members are not providing compensation directly, but rather expressing their opinions about certain content, which then results in automated dispersals of Steem from the blockchain.
* Steem, as a currency, is not directly convertible into USD. Currently it requires a minimum of two currency conversions to turn Steem in USD, as well as a significant degree of technical competency.
* Steem value in USD is humongously volatile and to try and treat it as income with a basis at the moment of receipt would make accurate reporting incredibly difficult.

# Which brings us back to our initial request.
## By representing steemit posts and comment values in USD or other fiat currencies, the Steemit administrators further confuse the issue of whether Steem should be considered taxable income upon receipt within Steemit itself and before the Steem is converted to bitcoin or USD.

When a layman, or ill-informed tax official, visits the Steemit website, they would rationally believe, based on the representations of the post and comment values, that Steem is undeniably a simple "convertible" currency.

The presence of a dollar value beneath each post, or a dollar value beside each account name, makes it appear that Steem is not only worth a set and consistent amount of USD, but that it is as simple to access as dropping your bank card in an ATM. This is not the case.

By flouting the fiat currency conversion rate at every opportunity, the Steemit administration risks burdening the Steemit community with a tax reporting burden of monumental proportions.

This turns every steemit user, essentially, into the sole proprietor of the "business" that is their steemit account.

This means keeping the kinds of records business owners keep - namely a ledger or receipts on every "transaction" as posts and comments vest after seven days.

### Make no mistake about it, the IRS COULD impose such a restriction, and indeed one day might do so in a way which, unlike the current notice, is unambiguous.

But by including equivalent currency values everywhere on the Steemit platform, the Steemit administration is hastening the arrival of such a ruling.

# Edit 1
## Concurrently,

Our request is straightforward: add a new feature to the Steemit UI which would make compliance with the IRS much easier.

All that would be required is a simple log maintained on each account indicating the date and time a post/comment vested, the USD value at the time of the vesting and a running total of vested values for each current taxable year. An "export:csv" component would simply allow us to print out and email that information as easily as possible and would also not be a difficult addition.

This small addition would substantially assist American Steemit users to comply with the US Tax code. It would also be easily transferable to other fiat currencies if and when those governments require such information.

# Edit 8 Possible addition:
# Finally, we request that the steem dollar be removed from the block chain. Having long since failed to peg successfully to the dollar it will serve only as a source of additional confusion in calculating future tax burdens.

To summarize once again: We, the Steemit community, request :

1. That all references to the "cash value" of Steem, Steem Dollars and Steem Power be removed from the Steemit UI and replaced with their actual value in Steem, Steem Dollars and Steem Power. (Perhaps not a good idea)

1. That a simple UI addition be created - a tax basis log - which would collect in one place a users vested posts/comments along with the tax basis of those posts in fiat currency. (seems to be a straight forward good idea)

1. That the steem dollar be eliminated from the blockchain as it has long since stopped pegging to the dollar and in calculating taxes will simply amount to a confusion multiplier (perhaps a good idea?)

This change to the Steemit UI is absolutely central to the community's future success. As the community grows, governments will take an increased interest in the tax ramifications of Steemit. The simple addition we are requesting will ensure the community and its members are able to adapt and/or comply with those regulations.

Sincerely Yours,

Members of Steemit.

Sort:  

I'm upvoting becasue you raise a good issue, but as an attorney and CPA I disagree with your conclusion.

The Internal Revenue Code makes it very clear that Americans are taxed on their worldwide income from any and all sources unless there's a specific exemption within the Code for a given source. Further, income is defined very broadly. For instance, if I find a buried treasure in my back yard, that counts as "income" and, in the absence of some exclusion, must be reported and taxed. This is true even if the thing found isn't gold or precious metals but rather a cultural artifact that nonetheless can legally be converted to dollars.

So, it's very clear to me that posting, curation and mining awards represent taxable income since they are not specifically excluded. The fact that they may be hard to value, or that they must first be converted into another cryptocurrency before being converted to dollars is irrelevant. The only relevant facts are that they CAN legally be traded (or converted) and that they have a market value that CAN be determined.

You seem to potentially disagree with me based on how the IRS defines the word "convertible" in Notice 2014-21. But I respectfully suggest that you are misreading what they are saying. "Convertibility" there refers to whether or not the item CAN LEGALLY be converted to to dollars and not whether there's an existing market to do so. For instance, if I find a rare one-of-a-king artifact in my back yard, the value of that artifact is taxable income to me (assuming I can legally sell it) even though there's no established market in which such artifacts are traded. In such cases, the value is usually determined by professional appraisal. However, if I'm forbidden to sell it (some states/countries have laws that say that found treasure belongs to the state and not the finder), then its NOT taxable income becasue it can't legally be converted to cash for my benefit.

Steem (unlike say frequent flier miles, which are subject to contractural provisions that legally prevent them from being sold for fiat) CAN legally be converted to dollars at values that CAN be determined. The fact that determining the value is inconvenient or difficult or costly is totally irrelevant. Hiring professional appraisers to appraise rare artifacts is likewise costly, but it's required.

In short, even if rewards were not quoted in dollars, it's almost a certainty that those rewards would still be taxable under current law. Consequently, I think it's very unlikely that your proposal would influence the tax effects at all.

By contrasts, I think your proposal would do great damage to the usability and understandability of Steemit. It would make it much harder for posters and curators to understand that what they are doing has real value in dollars. Consequently, I think it would adversely impact Steem's growth.

With technology, it's not that hard to determine the taxable income from such awards. Software (called LibraTax) do so already exists for Bitcoin. The software simply reviews the blockchain to determine how many bitcoin you were awarded or recieved and then multiplies that by the average market exchange rate at the time it was received to determine the dollar value (and therefore the amount that should be included in gross income) upon receipt. The same software could (and I predict will) be created for Steem.

DISCLAIMER: This post is not to be taken as tax or legal advice. Consult your own tax professional for guidance.

This is excellent and exactly why I put the draft up. I'm a criminal defense attorney, not a tax attorney. My whole point in addressing this issue is that I haven't seen it addressed anywhere else.

In truth, I'm not contesting on a personal level, whether this is convertible currency. My plan right now is to keep my own meticulous log of the vesting posts/comments for taxation purposes later and to cash out Steem to the extent of maximum potential tax rates and hold that until the end of the taxable year.

However in originally drafting this letter, I didn't want to speak only for myself and was not clear whether there was a consensus on the issue.

If you're saying there is a consensus, which seems consistent with the notice I cited to, then perhaps we should get rid of the first portion of the letter entirely. Do you agree that a new UI component - a tax basis log using info from the blockchain - would be a useful addition?

I agree it probably is taxed but the question is when is it taxed and how? In World of Warcraft or in the gaming world if a person trades in the game, technically those items could have some value when exchanged for fiat, so they have a price like Steem and Steem Dollars have a price, so why aren't they taxed instantly when traded in the game?

The reason seems to be it would destroy the gaming industry if gamers were taxed while in game and while in character. The same destruction would happen to cryptocurrency and Steemit. So why is Steemit different is the question from these other activities or are you saying that most gamers are currently tax cheats?

Dear IRS or anyone who can answer:
If someone owns real estate in second life or in a virtual world, and they charge rent to players to receive a virtual currency or some in game item, and these game world items become valued and priced in fiat (all game items and game accounts can have a price in fiat), the income taxes are paid on the fiat price the instant they make the trade in the game? Does this apply to Facebook accounts and any other account where there is a currency of some sort which can evolve to have a price in fiat?

All law abiding sides agree that income taxes are owed in the circumstance where someone sells a game item and receives fiat for it. If someone trades a game item for a game item, or receives a game item which can be sold for fiat whilst still in the game, where is the line drawn? If there is no line then every activity in any virtual world, or game, can be taxed. Can social media activity also be taxed if someone for example creates a Twitter bot which sends tokens to millions of accounts anonymously and these tokens have a price? Virtual currency is extremely broad, includes many activities which have nothing to do with Bitcoin, or crypto, and virtual currencies are ubiquitous online and will only become much more ubiquitous every year.

You seem to potentially disagree with me based on how the IRS defines the word "convertible" in Notice 2014-21. But I respectfully suggest that you are misreading what they are saying. "Convertibility" there refers to whether or not the item CAN LEGALLY be converted to to dollars and not whether there's an existing market to do so.

Is there any virtual currency or virtual reward of any kind which cannot be legally converted to dollars? If that is the only standard then if someone makes an anonymous Twitter bot which distributes currency to social media accounts then those account holders will owe taxes? There are major problems with this.

Steem (unlike say frequent flier miles, which are subject to contractural provisions that legally prevent them from being sold for fiat) CAN legally be converted to dollars at values that CAN be determined. The fact that determining the value is inconvenient or difficult or costly is totally irrelevant. Hiring professional appraisers to appraise rare artifacts is likewise costly, but it's required.

So can World of Warcraft gold, so can social media accounts, so can just about anything, but the question is can you predict how much fiat you will get for your Steem? I would argue you cannot. If you aren't trading the Steem directly for the fiat, then you're dealing with price fluctuation of Bitcoin which you must trade your Steem for to get to fiat. Bitcoin has a clear price in fiat while Steem has a price in Bitcoin. Everything which can be sold digitally has a price in Bitcoin, and virtual currencies which have no use, which you can make up right now, can have a price in Bitcoin if just one person buys it from you.

So if you create CPAcoin and you sell it for $1000 to one person, now it's $1000? Now if that one person gives it to some person, the person they give it to has $1000 in income? Do we not see a problem with this? How is Steem going to get adoption if cryptocurrency users are all going to be audited by the IRS?

Do you think people will want to touch Steem when they can just stick to getting paid the old fashioned way via Paypal and not have as much risk? If frequent flier miles are less risky to receive than Steem Dollars, everyone will prefer that because at least it has a stable price.

One possible addition to this letter would be requesting, in the alternative, that a simple ui addition be made whereby a log of post and comment payouts is kept, indicating the basis of the post or comment at the moment it vests.

I've added in language requesting a tax basis log.

A user indicated that there was no Steemit admin to address this letter to. That may be true, but there must be someone who built the UI and who can add or change it.

Who should this letter be addressed to?

You could always put out a request to the community to see if there's a python dev who is interested in using pysteem to create a tax log bot. Steem is open source, so, if there's a feature that you're interested in and you don't see the SteemIt, Inc dev handling it, you have the option to do it yourself.

Yeah this is the second best option -not a bad one if it comes down to it - but for the sake of the platform it would be better to have a decent ui element built in. As it gets more popular the technical savvy is going to drop precipitously. The result will be a bunch of stranded, potentially tax burdened users who may come to see steemit as too complicated to be worth the trouble.

It may be the best option. Perhaps, we need to get some CPAs/tax lawyers into touch with some pysteem devs to discuss the best way to build the functionality. While I do agree that the rise in popularity will see a reduction in technical abilities, I also think that it'll provide many business opportunities for developers. Creating some kind of app for figuring out tax liabilities would actually be a pretty good business, since every country will have different tax reporting requirements.

@sean-king mentioned a company that works on crypto tax implications - can't remember the name off hand but its in his comment and I emailed them to ask if they have anything for steemit.

I agree it is a good idea for a third party business - if I was a programmer or a CPA i would probably just start making the thing :).

I hear that! If I wasn't already bogged down with projects, I'd help you do it. :D

I'll go back through the comments and check them out!

@ned is who you should contact.

Excellent posting, I am not an US Citizen, but in Austria we have a similar situation with the last statement from our government from the year 2014. So regarding income via steem postings the issue might not only be the tax itself but the money you might have to pay to our state-social-security system. If you are e.g. a "free-write" it is another agency than from most of your regular jobs. So there is a lot of room for interpretation and I guess at one point in the (not so near) future a lot of people will have a "what the fuck" moment, getting letters from governmental agencies. So I absolutly would love to see the $ button replaced with the actual number of steem power you earn at the moment with your post, like at the time you claim it for your wallet. /signed :).

The best solution would be to remove Steem dollars completely from the blockchain. The pegging mechanism is completely broken and nobody is fixing it.

After that we could show the reward denominated only in steem.

https://steemit.com/sbd/@samupaha/sbd-is-broken-why-not-just-remove-it

It does seem like the Steem dollar is a bit of a bust in terms of it's stated goals.

But, actually, after this comment I'm not even convinced asking for removal of currency equivalence is a good idea.

If @sean-king is correct, then the die is cast on Steem as income with a basis at the moment you get it. If that's really the case, then getting rid of fiat currency equivalency might just confuse things irredeemably.

Still think a taxable basis log component would be a good idea though - waiting to see if any tax attorneys or CPAs agree.

The problem is that the peg isn't holding. So how the taxman will see SBD? Sometimes it's dollar equivalent, sometimes not. It just makes the system even bigger mess.

I agree with yiu there completely - and it does seem to add a huge additional and unnecessary complication. Perhaps that should be added to the letter as well. @sean-king, I'm sorry to keep calling out to you but your comment was really on point and I have no other CPAs to question about these things yet in the thread.

I think we need an "export csv" function which the programmers of Steemit with the support of Ned should code in. Then let individual users decide how and whether or not to pay taxes. The Steem Dollar amounts on our posts don't reflect anything and don't make it easier to calculate or do any accounting, in fact it confuses everyone involved. Very few people have deep understanding of how Steem Dollars work and even people who do, don't see it currently as a currency, or useful for anything, and Steem Power we don't even have control over until we power down, so how can we be taxed on something we don't actually own until we have control over it? It's just some code running with our account names attached to it until it becomes Steem or Steem Dollars, both which can actually be sold.

Agreed re:export csv. I'll add in some language about that.

Re:steemdollars - it seems like you can only get to steemdollars by first getting steem and banking it. I think the irs would look at the steem dollars as an investment of steem. The fact that the value is variable is sort of like any other mid to long term investment asset.

Lastly, do you agree with my decisiom to remove the request to get rid of fiat currency equivalents? It seems like all signs now point to that being less than helpful.

In

You bring up some interesting points. Though, I have to say, since SteemIt is a social media site, demanding a tax log seems a bit much after all, we use other social media sites in exchange for our data (which isn't currently taxable).

Perhaps, this demand should be raised at the various currency exchangers where the actual trades occur?

That would make sense if the valuation happened at the exchanges - but the problem is the irs says the valuation happens the moment you get the currency. That means when day seven comes and the steem or steem dollars are yours, you nees to remember the value on that day to calculate your income for the year.

I guess that's something that would need to be argued in the IRS courts.

As I see and understand it, "the moment you get the currency" would be the moment that it is traded from steem/sbd into fiat. At which point you would have access to the Fair Market Value. If one were to accumulate steem/sbd without ever having cashed it in, then that person would not have any income from the platform, just as a gamer has no income on in game earnings until they trade it for fiat.

I believe you've done SteemIt a service by bringing up this topic, however I think any possible solution will be much more complex than the creation of a tax log implies.

Here's why:

On writing platforms that use fiat-based REVshare models (PPC/PPV), the bloggers are required to fill out W2s, any earnings over $600 (or $400 - I can't recall which offhand) are reportable to the IRS, the platform is required to send out 1099s at the end of the year, all earnings must be maintained in a downloadable CSV, accounts must be ban-able/delete-able, the blogger is required to hook up some way of receiving payment (paypal, check, bank account), and since the payments are for writings the income is considered royalty payments.

There are even more issues when the platform is run by a US-based company that pays out to non-citizens. This is why many of these platforms don't make payments to non-citizens.

Thus, the tax liability questions become:

  1. does use of SteemIt fall under the royalty payment model?
  2. does use of SteemIt fall under the independent contractors model?
  3. does use of SteemIt fall under the cryptocurrency mining-pool model?
  4. if one, is the platform required to provide copyright protections and contracts?
  5. what are the platform's legal requirements for providing tax information to the user and the IRS?

NOTE: I'm sure there are other tax liability questions that I didn't list. These are just things pulled off the top of my head.

You are absolutely right - A tax log with a cvs export would NOT be a panacea solution. This whole thing is the forefront of currency theory. The final tax scheme is some ways away and will, eventually, probably require serious adaptation.

However - in terms of the here and now the following seems to be unequivocal based on the CPAs who have commented here and the material i linked to in the body of the post: when you get steem, in your steem account at the end of seven days - when you have possession of that steem to use as you see fit - the only really safe interpretation for tax purposes is "you just got paid".

Now, obviously some users will disagree and make their own choices about how they feel they should handle tax implications. But there seems to be a repeated opinion that steem=income and the value is whatever its usd value is on the date it vests to you. (Check out @sean-king comment on this thread)

Assuming that's the case - then a tax log and cvs export would make a huge difference in meeting short and mid term tax burdens.

As of now, based on what i've read from the irs and what the two CPAs who have commented on this have said, I plan on keeping my own ledger of this information. But most users won't be so assiduous and the whole experiment could implode when the IRS comes knocking, if it the UI doesn't make paying taxes under this paradigm easier.

In that case, then the likely way to treat everything is for each person to do just that, keep a primary record of their Steem/SBD earnings, a secondary record of their Steem-to-fiat trades, a tertiary record of their gains/losses on the trades, and a quarternary record of business expenses related to maintaining the office where they write/trade Steem.

Also why is Steem Power considered to be "income"? We don't actually own it until we power it down into Steem so how is it income? In mining, the miners don't declare income on possible future block rewards. So I fail to see how anyone knows what Steem Power is worth since it cannot be sold any easier than someone selling a Twitter account with a lot of followers.

Steem Dollars represent some amount of Steem so we can just think of Steem Dollars as Steem, and Steem Dollars are trade-able and are under the control of the account holder. The Steem Power isn't even under our control until we have completely powered down. So how is it taxed as income the moment our account receives it if we don't receive it at the same time? Our account can receive Steem Power which will be stuck.

So how about a thought experiment, what if the developers did a hard fork to set the power down rate to 6 years, and then let people post and earn lots of Steem Power? Would the CPAs still say people owe taxes on the Steem Power locked up for 6 years if there were no Steem Dollars in the UI? The Steem Dollars don't serve much purpose except to be a store of value and aren't pegged to the dollar. It can stay in the UI but let the account holder have the ability to choose between what to display, so personal preference is the determining factor.

Reference

  1. https://steemit.com/steem/@taxman/how-are-you-calculating-taxes-on-steem-income

There is no "we the steemit community" represented here, so please cease that language and convey such a consensus as TWO people, or 30 or 1000 representing WE, the Steemit Community, because you're neither the voice of the community and neither grasp the fundamentals of the platform/blockchain (no admins) and doing it for the purpose of furthering a MOOT, IRRELEVANT and UNIMPORTANT measure, as"hastening" of a ruling, it has no purpose, it's seeking to do something that will not make a difference in the eyes of the Fraud that is the IRS.

You need not sign on to this letter. I take it you may be anti-IRS and anti- taxation in general

I think the point here is that

A) removing the currency equivalents all over could potentially effect a final tax decision whenever it is made.

and now

B) The addition of a standalone UI component - a tax basis log - would be easy to implement using the blockchain info and would not be for the benefit of the IRS but for the taxpayer.

To the extent you refer to the IRS as a "Fraud" - I take that to mean you are anti-IRS or anti-taxation. As I often tell my clients: "You may not believe in the legitimacy of the judiciary or the criminal law, but it can damn well put you in jail."

Do you also ask the same clients to object during the arraignment to clarify where it demonstrates that the courts have authority? I very much doubt that, because you seem to be under the impression that they actually have authority.

Don't use the words "We the Community" because there is no such abstraction and least of all you aren't the person that was chosen leader to represent the community. In effect you are both giving legitimacy to a criminal cabal and seeking to imply there is such an abstraction as "We the community". The language you use is exemplary of deceit and the ends are to evade the legitimacy you imply of the IRS.

They can damn well kidnap me and kill me even but that doesn't damn well make it right or legitimate at all, thank you for another MOOT FUCKING POINT.

Makes sense I believe.

There is no Administration, period.

There are witnesses, and other platforms that work off the blockchain, but there isn't an Admin period over this issue.

Someone developed this UI - And presumably someone can change it. Who should it be addressed to?

And I don't mean that in a snarky way at all - this is exactly why i posted the draft. we need to find the person who can change this UI and attempt to influence them

It's a moot point, you are seeking to change an ui element in hopes to hasten the IRS in their motivations of continuing their criminal activities, it's spitting in the wind.

Well, look elsewhere in the comments and you'll see a very in depth explanation of why, perhaps, removing currency equivalency is actually a bad idea.

I'm waiting to see whether that commentor believes a request for a new tax basis log would be a good idea. If so, perhaps the whole letter will be redrafted.

Certainly everyone would prefer to have a clear idea of what their taxable income might be from Steemit, even if you don't believe in the legitimacy of the IRS . More knowledge is always helpful.

I don't care either way.

I understand, I don't "believe", I understand what Legitimate means, it implies agreement, consent and a return on a promise made of such agreement, as none of those things exist it's illegitimate.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.12
TRX 0.34
JST 0.032
BTC 113686.07
ETH 4144.19
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.77