Let me ask you again since you seemingly are oblivious to what the question was concerning:
How can a centralized censorship ridden "platform" compete with a censorship proof decentralized platform? You think that you can simply pay people better than steem so they can be censored? Seemingly you believe that censorship proof is not something important for steem or it's users, which is just as ridiculous as the thought that Facebook will pay it's users. Facebook is not in the business of employing their users at all, you do know that?
Centralized or decentralized has nothing to do with profitable or unprofitable. Steem is unprofitable. Facebook is profitable.
I didn't think Facebook would ever be profitable but I was wrong. They know how to run a business and make a profit. It's this element which Facebook is good at which Steem is horrible at. Along with UX which Facebook is brilliant at and Steem is horrible at.
Facebook is not in the business of employing their users at all, you do know that?
Facebook seeks to grow as much as possible. If it means letting users get paid then they'll do it. The competitors like Google has no problem letting users get paid. Twitter also is talking about integrating cryptocurrency. At this time I don't know what Jack plans to do with crypto but it shows me that Twitter has some plans.
Almost every single person pointed out that this is about decentralized Vs centralized, yet it's irrelevant. Nothing more needs to be said, especially when you think that freedom of expression isn't crucial here, since who wouldn't want to get paid for towing the elitist leftist party line.
Let me ask you again since you seemingly are oblivious to what the question was concerning:
How can a centralized censorship ridden "platform" compete with a censorship proof decentralized platform? You think that you can simply pay people better than steem so they can be censored? Seemingly you believe that censorship proof is not something important for steem or it's users, which is just as ridiculous as the thought that Facebook will pay it's users. Facebook is not in the business of employing their users at all, you do know that?
Posted using Partiko Android
Centralized or decentralized has nothing to do with profitable or unprofitable. Steem is unprofitable. Facebook is profitable.
I didn't think Facebook would ever be profitable but I was wrong. They know how to run a business and make a profit. It's this element which Facebook is good at which Steem is horrible at. Along with UX which Facebook is brilliant at and Steem is horrible at.
Facebook seeks to grow as much as possible. If it means letting users get paid then they'll do it. The competitors like Google has no problem letting users get paid. Twitter also is talking about integrating cryptocurrency. At this time I don't know what Jack plans to do with crypto but it shows me that Twitter has some plans.
Steem is still more profitable than any other platform combined.
Posted using Partiko Android
Almost every single person pointed out that this is about decentralized Vs centralized, yet it's irrelevant. Nothing more needs to be said, especially when you think that freedom of expression isn't crucial here, since who wouldn't want to get paid for towing the elitist leftist party line.
Posted using Partiko Android