There are many ways to do it but for the most part doing this safely is going to be a major technical challenge. It is not trivial. If they pull it off then we all can learn something.
One thing that concerns me about it is whether or not the developers have anticipated the potential introduction of vastly more powerful computing architectures than what we have today. For instance, what if large scale quantum computers because feasible in the next 20 years? Would be it be realistic to think that the biometric data stored by Voice could be cracked using quantum computers?
I think brute force is the least likely approach to cracking algorithms if they choose the right ones. I think it is more likely statistically that you'll see a hardware failure or developer failure than some brute force cracking even if there is 30 or 50 years effort. But this is just my opinion.
I don't think the data itself even needs to be stored, only a hash of it. Or hashes of its separate parts.
There are many ways to do it but for the most part doing this safely is going to be a major technical challenge. It is not trivial. If they pull it off then we all can learn something.
One thing that concerns me about it is whether or not the developers have anticipated the potential introduction of vastly more powerful computing architectures than what we have today. For instance, what if large scale quantum computers because feasible in the next 20 years? Would be it be realistic to think that the biometric data stored by Voice could be cracked using quantum computers?
I think brute force is the least likely approach to cracking algorithms if they choose the right ones. I think it is more likely statistically that you'll see a hardware failure or developer failure than some brute force cracking even if there is 30 or 50 years effort. But this is just my opinion.