You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal
I'm AGAINST all of the propsed changes.
On the author/curation split just make a slider in the range 60/40 to 100/0.... for flexibilitie.
I'm AGAINST all of the propsed changes.
On the author/curation split just make a slider in the range 60/40 to 100/0.... for flexibilitie.
I've wanted the custom curation slider for ages.
If we have a curation slider, most votes will go for anything set near 100% or 100% curation over time.
...and someone can use an account to make posts with 100% curation and upvote the post with alt account(s) for 100% post reward.
You just planted 0.10 tree(s)!
Thanks to @ucukertz
We have planted already
7982.00 trees
out of 1,000,000
Let's save and restore Abongphen Highland Forest
in Cameroonian village Kedjom-Keku!
Plant trees with @treeplanter and get paid for it!
My Steem Power = 21297.03
Thanks a lot!
@martin.mikes coordinator of @kedjom-keku
That's just equivalent to self-voting, nothing extra.
Reward-wise, yes. But on bots that tracks self-vote it won't count as such.
You just planted 0.10 tree(s)!
Thanks to @ucukertz
We have planted already
7908.25 trees
out of 1,000,000
Let's save and restore Abongphen Highland Forest
in Cameroonian village Kedjom-Keku!
Plant trees with @treeplanter and get paid for it!
My Steem Power = 20403.29
Thanks a lot!
@martin.mikes coordinator of @kedjom-keku
I think this is probably one of the better ideas so far. Greedy users won't see nearly as many upvotes, but others who split the pot will see others come along and upvote...
And a new proof is born... Proof of Greed. 😆