As i have said before, the future will be everyone having their own "Wall Server"
The problem right now with implementing the things you have said is bandwidth. Thus requiring servers in facilities near internet junctions.
Else, there are all kinds of other solutions.
Maybe something like Bit Torrent, IPFS, like P2P, Holo Chain, etc.
Most of these do not work large scale. Current home bandwidths are 20% upload/80% download.
If we start running more BitTorrent, this becomes a bottleneck.
It's a far lesser bottleneck than centralized servers.
The real problem I see coming is funding infrastructure. ISPs not collecting rent for their pipes are going to shut them down. We need our own.
The next inter-connects won't have a physical infrastructure for connections.
But i have a real problem trying to work out how to get your packets out of a soup of all packets.
i could use cell phone array mathematics... but i do not believe that will be the best solution.
Interesting.
Right, could a "5g" network become like "hooli-net"?
Allowing us to "share" everything peer-to-peer and cutting the ISPs out completely?
5G is not a thing. Or, specifically, not a single thing. There is a lot of pieces to 5G.
Currently many home wifi routers use 5G, but it is really low power stuff.
Then there is the 5G that the state wants to implement where they basically bathe the entire world in 1mm band radiation.
But the answer to your question is, no, the first step in 5G is straight to the ISP.
You even eliminate your own personal routers.
Agreed.
Perhaps it would be feasible if someone made a "text only" (bittorrent-style) version of the steem blockchain?
The STEEM blockchain is text only.
One of my ideas would be for everyone to host their own data, and probably mirrored by some close friends.
The browser would then have to assemble the front page from all of your friends.
Perhaps it would be feasible if someone made a "text only" (bittorrent-style) version of the steem blockchain?
Yea Maybe