Maybe he's confused by the fact that you flag content when you don't like the rewards that such content is receiving, but then run to the defense of your preferred users when their content is flagged for the same reason by others.

Is that not also hypocrisy? I thought that a flag was "just a downvote" and that it shouldn't be taken so personally. If that's the case that you want to argue all the time, why do you get so upset when your preferred users are flagged?

These are legitimate questions to ask, given your own blog posts and comments on the matter.

For the record - I don't use the flag/downvote for rewards corrections (or pretty much anything, for that matter), so I have no dog in this fight. I think it's petty. If there is an actual abuse, then it needs to be addressed, otherwise, the adjustments should be made on the backend to mitigate "unfairness" (whatever we want that to mean) of stake-weighted rewards distribution.