You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Announcement: All votes will be up to 8 times more powerful in new hard fork!
So today i seem to get around 35 votes if i vote slowly over the course of 24 hours (or during my 5 hour session) per day. These votes recover faster the less I cast them and always repair to 100% value after 5 days ?
Is this correct? So how many votes will I earn per day with this new voting power ? (currently as I said 35 votes) how might this change ???
Your votes recover the same speed, no matter how many you cast. Always. If you like voting 35 times per day, keep voting 35 times per day. In the new system, your voting power will be under 20% if you vote that much, but there is nothing wrong with that! In fact, if your voting power is ever at 100%, you're not voting enough.
I publish a novelty blog about
Steemit College level education hints and tips. Not because I know anything worthwhile, but to convince people Steemit is not a get quick rich scheme.
Becoming a journalist, marketing ad visor, accountant, or any other skill that requires commitment like teacher college takes years of hard work, money and study.
Currently I am watching two new people recently joining Steemit rise through the ranks. This is because they have spent years learning writing and presenting to earn those skills.
So my writing sucks; as you can see, so I vote. I vote to keep my steemd.com voting power between 87 % and 97 %, not to high = wasted at 100 % and not to diluted when low, this equals 35 votes per steem session . . .
Thank you for the Hints : )
/ hugz ; )
Sounds like a good strategy! After the change, you could adjust your target to between 10% and 20%, and your influence will stay about the same.
Voting is virtually worthless as an income; right ?
The money comes from Authoring and Curating, voting is simply a novelty factor as far as making gold here on Steemit ? Correct ?
Put another way is voting even worth trying to do financially : )
/ hugz ; )
Voting = curating. That is how curation is defined in Steemit, it´s not financially a good investment of your time if you have a small amount of SP (like myself). Of course you will receive little to no reward if your vote is not timed correctly.
You see what you learn by opening your mouth and asking . . . I thought authoring was blogging and curating was posting with the votes being some separate bingo raffle lottery draw type thingy.
So having 300 steem power it is almost useless trying to have any noticeable impact with voting ???
So trying to be efficient with strategic voting is just like walking around the shopping mall picking up penny's ; hoping for that nickle or dime to be overlooked by others . . .
Is that a fair comparison ? : )
/ hugz ; )
Yes and No. If your goal is to make money out of curating then unless if you have a fair amount of SP it´s not worth it to just vote. A better strategy when curating if you do not have a sizable amount of SP is to comment on posts in addition to voting. In this way if your comments are insightful you can start building a reputation and networking with others by following and getting others to follow you. In this way when you post an articule it´s easier to get others to vote for you.
It´s all about how much you invest and the best investment is time in others in my opinion.