The Heavyweight Fight Everyone Wants To See: Tyson Fury Vs. Anthony Joshua - Boxer Vs. Puncher - Who Wins?
The Gypsy King returns
Looking at the Twitter posts and vids of Tyson Fury's Marbella training camp it's easy to see that the weight is melting off him since his last fight win over Klitschko in November 2015.
Fury has been sparring with WBO middleweight champ Billy Joe Saunders, and he's supposedly lost 23lbs in weight already.
The world now awaits for the super-fight of the year to be arranged: Anthony Joshua Vs. Tyson Fury. This would be an interesting matchup of styles as their styles are so very different.
The super-fight we all want to see
Joshua used his vicious power against Klitschko, but sometimes carrying too much muscle can cause stamina problems which Joshua showed during the fight. For long spats of the bout he looked gassed out!
Fury is a different animal. He is an out and out boxer and can dodge and weave like Floyd Mayweather, which is amazing for his 6'9" frame. He is a tricky customer to hit. He doesn't have the greatest punch in the game, but he can adapt and change his stance very quickly. He is like a boxing chameleon. As soon as a boxer has fathomed him out, he changes again to baffle them.
I think this fight has to happen due to the sheer amount of money to be made on it. But who wins? In my eyes Fury has the greater experience and better boxing skills, so my money will always be on The Gypsy King over 'Baby' Joshua. I predict the fight will happen this time next year in some huge stadium in Manchester or London. The Gypsy King is indeed back in business!
Box on my Steemian friends!
I believe Tyson Fury is hte best out their, dont get me wrong, Joshua is good but there is something about Fury I really admire and I think he would be able to overcome Joshua.
Steem on
He has that tough gypsy spirit - I think that's what it is @bootyp :)
Dear @mindhunter, I definitely know who is winning this fight. The promoters will make the deal!
I reckon it'll be £15-20 million each for the fight too ... still not bad for 36 minutes work ;)
This post has been ranked within the top 50 most undervalued posts in the first half of May 03. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $2.93 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: May 03 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.
Who wins @screenname??