You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Omega Point: The Meaning of Life

Yes Alex, Can you please explain How Homo Sapiens Sapiens come to have 46 chromosomes (haploid 23), while ALL other Anthropoids have 48? (haploid 24)? If one takes the best candidate Anthropoid "Lake Turkana boy" and compares the skeleton with Humans, NOT A SINGLE BONE works in a human body. Darwinian evolution of "Origin of the Species" IS falsified by the "Irreducible complexity" of the vast biological machines within the Nucleus of a single cell. Darwin's own honest caveat; “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..." Irreducible Complexity" does just that, thanks to the Electron Microscope, which shows us the exquisite machines inside of Cells & Cell nuclei. Darwin's theory is falsified. Michael Behe is correct, please really study the work of this biologist. http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/07/so_michael_behe087901.html Adaption is not evolution. BTW we did not loose the Genes of two Chromosomal pairs, they appear to have been fused into our 2nd chromosome with the HAR-1 Complex. 224 genes that are found ONLY in Homo Sapiens so far, no other species have these specific genes. Can you plz give an account for How that happened? If you consider that it came from an Anthropoid, which one; in How much time? Thank you for your time & consideration.

Sort:  

"Yes Alex, Can you please explain How Homo Sapiens Sapiens come to have 46 chromosomes (haploid 23), while ALL other Anthropoids have 48? "

The Christian professor Kenneth Miller can.

"Darwinian evolution of "Origin of the Species" IS falsified by the "Irreducible complexity" of the vast biological machines within the Nucleus of a single cell."

No actual examples of this have ever been found. The ones Michael Behe purports have in fact been explained by evolutionary biologists, by identifying less complex variants on the rotary 'motor' of the flagellum which still serve a useful purpose. See below:

"Michael Behe is correct, please really study the work of this biologist."

Michael Behe's claims of irreducible complexity were directly disproven in court, during the Dover vs. Kitzmiller trial. Ask yourself why you weren't informed of this by the creationist sources you get your information from. Likewise with Kenneth Miller's proof of chromosomal fusion in human ancestors.

Adaption is not evolution.

Only according to creationists, and only because we can prove beyond any doubt that it occurs. They artificially draw the line there. Enough accumulated adaptation results in speciation. This was proven in an experiment involving e. coli during which speciation was directly observed, thanks to how rapidly microorganisms reproduce and how short their lifespans are.

Here's some additional reading that I recommend:

one
two
three
four
five

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.13
JST 0.028
BTC 64657.99
ETH 3153.39
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.59