The art of governing a country.

in #society2 years ago (edited)

The art of governing a country is quite simple. Many will speak of splendid theories, of systems with meticulously designed counterweights, of such and such an ideology, of republics and empires, of federations and confederations, of tyrannies and democracies, in short, of countless things that have nothing to do with it.

Politics is confused with governance, form of government with government itself, and other very common mistakes in people who are alienated from power.

Governing a country is all about you. And no, I am not referring to a hypothetical scenario in which you are president, king or prime minister of a nation, none of that, I mean you right now. Governing a country is all about you.

Normally we tend to project power to the rulers, as if the government were composed solely of them. Let's look at this, for there to be a government there must be two things; governors/rulers and the governed/people, the government depends on these two, and therefore, none of these parts is replaceable or independent as long as there is a government.

The rulers are always a very small minority, a handful of men perhaps, and their power resides precisely in the projections that the governed give them. The rulers have de jure power, however, the consensus of the governed is necessary for this power to be put into practice.

When there is a stable government, the governed give their support to the rulers, so that the latter don't meet with any dissidence, in such a way that they can act freely and make full use of their faculties. As the social discontent increases, and therefore, dissidence increases, the rulers find themselves with more and more adverse wills on the part of the governed. And finally, if this is taken to the extremes, what will happen is that the governed will stop cooperating with the rulers at all, in such a way that even if they still have legal power, in fact there will be no presence of their power.

This is especially true in countries in crisis such as Venezuela or Iraq, where, despite the fact that governments continue to exist, which legally continue to exercise power, their orders are only enforced in the places closest to the government headquarters, and as that we are moving away from the capital, we will notice how the presence of the government gradually disappears until we finally reach some points where there is no government at all.

This is because there is no cooperation between the governors and the governed, and let us remember that the rulers are a very small group concentrated in some specific points, and without the cooperation of the governed, they don't have power. They don't have an all-seeing eye, they are not omnipresent, nor omnipotent.

I know that some like to think so, that thanks to technology or to this or that mechanism, the rulers are on us all the time. Not so, they are not even so capable. I also know that some like to think that the rulers are overly intelligent and that every action they perform is meticulously planned and they never make mistakes. We also have no reason to think about that. In fact, I would say that modern rulers are not very intelligent, they are certainly not smarter than you or me, in any case, they would be "experts", that is, they learn through experience to govern, based on the slow process of try and failure. If they were truly intelligent, people like you or me would not even worry about government matters, because they did their job very well.

There is also the case in which, not the governed, but the rulers believe themselves omnipotent, such is the case of totalitarians. The totalitarian governments are destined to fail because they seek that the smallest sector of the population (governors/rulers) be responsible for the tasks of the largest sector (governed/people).

Now, we are already aware that power resides in people, but what do we do with it? Many people already have this knowledge, that's nothing innovative. Many know that the power is in people but still they don't do anything. What is the point of knowing but not doing? And in any case, what should be done?

It is as simple as this; we should not worry about what we don't control, it is unnecessary, it is an expenditure of energy in something that we cannot change. Among those things that we control, what bothers us, we change it. Pretty simple. It is not always easy, but it is always simple.

That everyone controls himself? I know, it's innovative, it's called liberty, which is inevitably inseparable from its sister called responsibility.

We must be like the apple tree, which is responsible for growing and ripening its fruits without worrying that a mammal will take it, the latter will be responsible for doing their job. Or like the flowers, which are responsible for producing the nectar and pollen, and dressing the most striking colors for insects to carry out the pollination process. They do everything they can, everything that is in their control, everything that corresponds to them, and the insects will take care of doing their thing.

So with us. If something bothers us, we change it. If we cannot change it, it better not bother us. And without ever expecting someone outside of us to do something to solve our annoyances, because in that case, we project power in such people, and we are not responsible for ourselves, even worse, we will depend on them to be well.

I know well that there are problems that transcend us, which are problems that affect the whole society, a very precise example of this is that of pollution. Let us remember for these cases the errors of totalitarians, who seek, being very few, to do the work of many. Let's avoid making this same mistake. We can't be held responsible for such large problems. The only thing that falls under our responsibility is to do those little things that we can do to help solve the problem, but we should never assume on our back all the full weight, because our back will be broken and the problem, far from being reduced, will be bigger .

If we want to reduce pollution, avoid polluting. If we want a virtuous society, let us be virtuous. Anyway, let's be what we want to see. Many in past and modern times have wanted to implement fantastic utopias out of their imagination, all believe that such projects are pushed from top to bottom, from the rulers to the governed. I'm sorry for them, but that's not how the government works. Utopias begin when we, as individuals, decide to do what an archetypal individual, typical of such a utopia, would do.

If we are not willing to make such sacrifices, it is best that we stop aspiring to such ideals.

The art of governing a country is very simple then, it is only about governing ourselves, taking care of what belongs to us, and trusting that others will do the same.

If you want to change the world, start off by making your bed.
William H. McRaven


Image Source: 1

Sort:  

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

It is infinitely more difficult to change and improve the self than to use force to bend the externals to fit man's whims. The former requires effort, discipline, humility, and wisdom. The latter merely requires energy and discontent. Much of the world's ills can be attributed to those men lacking self-discipline and virtue, attempting to enforce their myopic self-interest upon their environment, using obtuse force. The greatest evil lies in the minds of reformers and do-gooders who obsessively work to "fix" others, while remaining incapable of self-reflection and self-discipline.

Absolutely. It is infinitely more difficult to control ourselves than to control others, but it is the only way possible.

The greatest evil lies in the minds of reformers and do-gooders who obsessively work to "fix" others, while remaining incapable of self-reflection and self-discipline.

You know what they say "the road to hell is paved with good intentions".

Regards!

I am exceedingly grateful for your voice of reason and heart. It inspires me, encourages me and shows me that we are not alone with how we think and feel. There are even many of us.

You have very interestingly illustrated how the misbelief that we believe to be constantly controlled and monitored by Big Brother inhibits and paralyzes us. It is more a mental construction, a voluntary prison in which man is imprisoned than a fact.

I experience my own chosen liberty very much in my work, where I make full use of my creative freedom. Nobody is there who suspiciously controls me and tells me how to do things. What has to do with the fact that I have few conflicts with colleagues and clients, because I don't see any. I am concerned with cooperation, mutual understanding and solving problems that need to be solved as soon as they fall within my sphere of influence.

I love your pragmatism in this respect very much and I believe that those who do it with equal courage are just not so loud and profile oriented and therefore one thinks they don't exist. They are less visible.

Sometimes my sense of mission is uncomfortable and I'm briefly unsure whether it should be that I blog. But then I read your contributions and come to the insight: Yes, it may be.

Thank you very much for these intelligent lines.

I love your pragmatism in this respect very much and I believe that those who do it with equal courage are just not so loud and profile oriented and therefore one thinks they don't exist. They are less visible.

Absolutely, I've realized that there are mainly two types of people in such aspects; those who do things by appearance, to be good in the eyes of others; and those who do what they think they should do, even if that is judged wrong by others or if they don't receive any recognition.

The first ones have no decision, they do what people think is good and they will not do anything by themselves if nobody pays attention to them. The seconds often go unnoticed, they are invisible, but always, always, always, they are there, and they are a number not despicable at all.

You have very interestingly illustrated how the misbelief that we believe to be constantly controlled and monitored by Big Brother inhibits and paralyzes us. It is more a mental construction, a voluntary prison in which man is imprisoned than a fact.

That mainly, and although in the post I externalize the idea, it is also important to note that this is not reduced only to matters of governance. Its a complete philosophy of life. On a more personal level, if we stop worrying about things that we can't control, such as the past, the future, the lives of other people, how people see us, other people's responsibilities, etc., we can free ourselves from that mental construction, that voluntary prison in which man is imprisoned.

This is in fact what I thought when writing parts like:

It is as simple as this; we should not worry about what we don't control, it is unnecessary, it is an expenditure of energy in something that we cannot change. Among those things that we control, what bothers us, we change it. Pretty simple. It is not always easy, but it is always simple.

Many and true thanks for all your compliments.

I think you are underestimating politicians. You are right in the sense that they are not more intelligent than us however, they are extensively trained in the use of language. This skill allows rulers/elite to convince the governed that they are not only smarter than them but to also convince the governed that they are incompetent and need the elite to make decisions for them.

I agree with you in fact, that's why I said that they were experts, those are things that they have learned throughout their lives, but they don't seem to be very intelligent because their actions are, if you watch carefully, predictable.

A Major Democrat Left Jaws on the Floor with this Play:

Everyone knew this Democrat was far to the Left.

But no one expected him to partner with an organization with such a liberal agenda.

Now, folks are asking whether he’ll run for office again, and whether he’ll decide to conceal this move.

Get the full story.