SMT Voting Mana Deep Dive!!steemit changes



Hi Stamins, I'm @tigar-steem, and today I want to share with you some interesting changes in how I handle voting with SMT that they've been working on over the past few years. Are becoming goals. The year that has progressed is to move forward. The most intuitive and fair. We want SMT to be the latest protocol for web applications, and these are technological changes that, unaware of our unprecedented experience with STEM, will help us meet that promise. This will help us talk about SMT, be sure to review the latest blockchain update in which we have updated an update for SMT messenger on ETA and platform independent status files. Revealed.

Voting is at the heart of the STEM mentality algorithm, which we believe will be of vital value to developers who launch SMTs, so we want to ensure that this protocol is dynamic. When it comes to medicine, the voting process should be as smooth as possible.

When Steam was first released, every account had voting power of 0 to 100%. This system is still present in many interfaces and stem names. As rewards are calculated, the ability to vote for an account is multiplied by the fundamental power to achieve something we call "reward." recent blockchain update The Rewards section is an internal system that helps author tracker blockchains and compensation bonuses.

The problem with this approach is that the percentage of voting power is only two accuracy, that is, the smallest amount we can represent is 0.01%. Consumers using their voting power, the accuracy of these calculations went from bad to worse, and at a small level of voting power, the system was almost useless. In addition, this system did not interact well with staff and delegation authority, and made it easier to use voting rules than you would normally expect. They can.

Enter the Mana Rating.

At Hard Fork 20, we turned the internal representation of voting funds into voting funds, which helped eliminate some of the key flaws. The basic principle is the same. The same concept of survival for price voting is still available, but it is more accurate and permanent. Voting is the cost of mediation that was calculated by the first count of voting power and pitch strength. The renewal of voting power is now more accurate, as are the values ​​that lead to content sharing. With this change, we have been able to maintain the rules related to power and delegation and eliminate exemption from STEM.

Vote directly with Mana.

Although we have changed the internal structure of the link trunk to use for voting, we still use percentages in the voting process. Percent accuracy is not bad, but it is less than ideal for accurate voting. This is especially true when you change your voice. For example, if the maximum mana is 1,000,000 and you vote on content that weighs 50 pounds, you would use 10,000 mana. (100% of the vote is 1/50 of your remaining votes.) If you go later and turn your voice to 100% you will use 19,800 votes. If 100% have already voted, then the cost of voting will be 20,000. This addiction is invisible by using a percentage of the weight.

At SMT Hard Fork, we add a new voting process that will directly vote with celebrated voting. Self-voting restrictions have been implemented, but they will explain the effect of the vote. This process will be used to vote on all SMTs and allow users to vote separately with each SMT, which contains different amounts of mana. This will allow you to control the content using another SMT while reducing costs with other SMTs. 5 SMTs can be identified in 5 comments that can vote on a total of 6 assets (5 accumulated STMs).

There is another strange quality from the previous example. You didn't feel it.

I changed your sound from 50% to 100% and used a total of 29,800 mana when 100% used only 20,000 mana for the first time! When you change your voice, any credits you receive will be lost. We think voting is difficult to change.

Full receipt of both votes is punished unnecessarily, which is why the following changes were made to compensate the votes.

If you increase the share of the absolute bonus set by voting, you are only charged for the delta. You will still be responsible for replacing the bottom and vice versa. Here are some examples to help explain how these rules affect your vote.

If you change the vote from 75% to 100%, that means a 25% increase.

If you change 100% of the vote to 50%, you are not in this mode.

If you convert 50 votes to 50, you will be considered 50 votes.

If you change the -50% vote to -100%, you agree to the 50% vote.

It doesn't matter if you change the rating to -100--25 change.

If you are uptime -25% to 75% uptime, this means a 75% upgrade.

We are confident that these changes will continue the progress we have made over the past few years to make voting easier and better for everyone.