RE: SMT POCKETS - (Phase 1) TRANSPARENT, OPEN and PUBLIC DISCUSSION. (WEEK 2)
I admire your zeal for SMT as it relates to POCKET. It's easy to ignore resources, rather than create value for them. I really like the idea of POCKET and an SMT POCKET is intriguing. I'm not certain I'm able to wrap my brain around the intricacies of SMT to speak intelligently about it, but I do question your second point (1.2) in which simply the creation of an SMT POCKET would automatically generate high visibility on Steemit and other social media by virtue of it not being mixed and matched with the current POCKET tokens. One does not seem to lead to the other.
Considering the number and variation of SMT already available, it seems awareness would have to be generated by a lot more than simply the creation of a new one, whether it's known by a similar name to the current POCKETs or not. Your current strategy of drawing awareness to the POCKET tokens by using them in raffles is an interesting one and I think more things along this line would need to be done before there could be any movement on an SMT POCKET through name awareness. @ironshield
With over 6000 Pocket Token owners out there, I am sure that we have the resources to move forwards with this idea.
Another fact-check: fewer than 2000 accounts have POCKET. The number shows up in @pocket-pi's statistics post.
OK, I must have misread the other weeks report, seemed to me that it said 6000.
However, between 1500 and 2000 people, that is a mighty fine group of individuals there!