Very Interesting read but I think you have some flaws in your reasoning

Women are programmed to like the "strong" alpha-male type, even if his behavior is bad towards her. The beta type, who is typically well-behaved, should be rejected or frowned upon as a "weakling" - based on the same programming.

This doesn't always apply. Is it a glitch on the system? Also, I would assume you are not a fan of Evolution. Based on what we assume today as science, we randomly evolved from other forms of life. Going back enough you can find our basic protein structure in meteorites.

As observers of our nature we assume that we are the center of the universe while in fact, based again on our observations, space, galaxies, nebulas or earth do not seem programmed but rather random. Think about it. We live on a planet with 75% salt water and call it earth..suitable for us? Even if our programmer sceduled this, surely he could have done a much better job.

After evaluating the various factors and conflicting tendencies of this reality my conclusion is that our goal while living within this Simulation is to acquire the ideal virtuous behaviors of the moral compass by doing what feels right, despite all the obstacles and disorienting factors that have been coded to act as such within this Simulation.

This is not true because morality is based on the environment. What "Feels "right is rather learned. For example in Canada, it is hypothesized that Inuits sometimes eat their child to survive harsh winters. The morality says that they can always try next year. If they die though their genes perish.

More to the randomness of the world that is not a simulation, adds the fact that people with mental disorders and genetic deficiencies cannot get out of the game. Why would they be designed? Also 75% of the planet doesn't have water, shelter and food on a daily basis. Why add so many individuals in the planet?

So we can watch the matrix and make hypothesis about ourselves? I think pop culture and science fiction have distorted our sense of reality and we rarely take into consideration all the factords going on around us.

There 50.000.000 child slaves today. 16.000 children die everyday from hunger. There are dinosaur fossils, human fossils. Are they all planned?

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence.

The only evidence we have that our universe is a simulation (not even a scheduled one) is a science paper we came up with. This is rather self -confirming fallacy since it cannot be teted.

The whole idea is based on human arrogance. That we are somehow different or special from other animals. We are not. We think we are but we are not.