Former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio found guilty of criminal contempt By Carma Hassan and Darran Simon

The lawman who once gloated he was "America's hardest sheriff," could end up in the slammer after a government judge discovered him liable of criminal hatred on Monday.

Previous Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio was blamed for damaging a court arrange in a racial profiling case by proceeding with watches focusing on migrants. US District Court Judge Susan Bolton passed on her decision in court papers marked on Monday.

2016: Sheriff Arpaio defends Trump policies

Bolton composed that Arpaio knew about the court arrange and what it implied for his specialization's strategy of confining foreigners to turn them over to government movement experts. Be that as it may, the confirmation indicated "a blatant carelessness" for the request, Bolton composed.

"Not exclusively did litigant renounce obligation, he reported to the world and to his subordinates that he would proceed with nothing new regardless of who said something else," Bolton composed.

Arpaio has battled the request wasn't clear and he didn't plan to damage it. Arpaio's guard lawyer has contended that Arpaio's previous lawyer "failed" and didn't plainly clarify the request or look for elucidation from the government judge who issued it.

Government prosecutors affirmed his resistance was ponder, and something he trusted he could escape with.

The 85-year-old could confront up to a half year in prison when he is condemned on October 5.

Arpaio's lawyers, Dennis and Jack Wilenchik, said in an announcement that the previous sheriff would request the decision to get a jury trial. The announcement said Bolton abused the Constitution by issuing the decision without understanding it to Arpaio in court.

"Her decision is in opposition to what each and every witness affirmed for the situation. Arpaio trusts that a jury would have found to support him, and that it will," the announcement said.