You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Pressure mounts on Facebook and Google to stop anti-vax conspiracy theories - ‘Repetition of information, even if false, can often be mistaken for accuracy.’
There is a very significant amount of revenue on the line for the vaccine manufacturers, so...
It's more insidious than that. If you research this you will find doctors and nurses alike exposing the blatant underreporting and miss reporting of vaccine cause illness and death by a factor of 15-1, reporting that for example in England when forced immunization was pushed in the 1860, blaming smallpox for the clear injury from vaccination. This continues to this day with every single vaccination known, doctors, and nurses especially, still document the disparaging underreporting and misreporting of vaccine injury. The fact that almost 200 million people have been knowingly injected with SV40 among a plethora of pathogens that are known to cause all kinds of problems, from cancer to paralysis. All this in turn creates a perpetual influx of profits for the entire machine that to this day claims the conjecture of how the immune system works and how viruses function as it's most important achievement. It has attempted to denounced and discredited almost anyone who dared to question the conjecture, from virologists and immunologist alike to microbiologists, doctors, nurses and all kinds of technicians in between the numerous other professionals that decided to investigate, and yes, some after seeing first hand the damage vaccination caused in their loved ones. The AMA has been complicit or completely incompetent as have the numerous virologists and immunologist that claimed to have isolated viruses by methods so crude that it would turn your stomach and make your heart drop into it at the same time. Don't believe me, look at how for example poliovirus was isolated in 1908, and 40 years later, the methods are there for anyone who cares to open the journals where it's published for the public, or look at what the CDC outlines as the procedure for identifying if a person who shows symptoms of poliovirus has poliovirus.
Look up the Perth group for more revolting revelations about the insidious nature of "testing".
Can you point me to some links/articles/papers on this?
Start with the first two books I cited in my initial remark. Another place is to read the study titled Immunolabeling for light and electron microscopy: not for the faint of heart and then try to get ahold of Shelley's Microbiology and compare the revelations of the study to the claims it makes in a textbook that has over 600 pages full of pictures and claims and a whooping zero citations or reference to substantiate any of them, many of which are outright preposterous and clearly impossible to verify or validate, like different strains of viruses, and the pictures just as fraudulent and make believe.
Posted using Partiko Android