While its difficult to stereotype - as there are always exceptions - and this is an interesting angle, I think it's far more interesting to focus on the archetypes that underly male and female, and where we are in history, before you can get to the core about "privilege".

See if you can agree with this - and if you can spot a pattern in the "Ying and Yang":

Male

cpu / polling / serial / efficiency / bigger is better / calling / giving / pursuer / hunter / prefer few big decisions / centralization / micromanagement / fear

Female

gpu / interrupts / parallel / multitasking / more is better / waiting / receiving / gatekeeper / gatherer / good at lots of little decisions / decentralization / delegation / trust

Conversely though, they reflect on each other - each transaction or action has two ends and they are complimentary.

Male

lots of sperm / polygamy

Female

limited eggs / monogamy

I'm not judging or saying "this is how it is." It's just an interesting lens to apply, that could help you think about things differently and reach insights that you might not reach otherwise.

Men thrive in a world of scarcity, from that whence we came. Women thrive in a world of abundance, like the one we are now entering. We are moving from a man's world to a woman's world.