Sort:  

Yeah exactly. So this gravitational redshift approach is specifically intended to address why dark energy does not exist, as it was interpreted to exist due to accelerating rate of redshift per distance.

At smaller distances, the rate of redshift per distance is essentially constant which is known as Hubble's Law; this is because the Figure-8 sizes of subsequent orbits are essentially the same initially and then begin to shrink exponentially over larger distances. Hubble's Law is considered linear, but really it is just the linear portion of an exponential, where it has yet to "take off" so it appears like a linear relationship within a certain range. This is why we had "expansion of space" initially, then saw redshift per distance became exponential and instead of recognizing them to all be caused by the same thing, another new concept was added on top of "dark energy" to attempt to explain the observations.

This is where Occam's Razor really drives home that these added complexities to the model are misinterpretations rather than actual descriptions of reality because the observations can also be the result of gravity as we are discussing, which requires no additional fundamental elements in the model but rather removes many.

Valueassignmenthelp.com is the finest website for assignment help online and homework help services. We have 10years of experience PhD level experts for all subjects. Value-assignment-help highly searched website for paperwork and content writers. check our services and our coverage range.
Best online assignment help

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 60192.33
ETH 2321.67
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50