The notion of "space" being sold to humanity is an incredibly funny but very childish lie !!!
Hre's some very obvious proof
-venus "orbits" closer to the sun than earth
-and "night" is created when we face away from sun
-so we should never see venus at night
Because... the orbits of the planets are not in a flat plane like that. They rotate at different angles.
Sure they do keep telling yourself that But you can actually go out at night a see they dont , and that the plane they "orbit" on called the "ecliptic" is observably a VERY FLAT PLANE
The point I was trying to make is that all the planets do not travel around our star along the same plane. That is why you can see the other planets. Their orbit is not equal distance from the star, and it is also not in the same plane.
You know, if you actually read the article, it spends most of it explaining how this astronomical event is possible. You have to be a special kind of wilfully ignorant to take this as evidence for a flat Earth.
What's funny is that if we were on a flat earth, we should be able to see Venus all the time. So, where does Venus go when we cant' see it when it should be embedded in the dome with all the other stars we see all night long every night? If there a different 'track' in the dome that Venus is on? Does it sink to the edge of the dome and sometimes 'float' to the top on the exact schedule one would see it if it were on an orbit around the sun? I wonder how that works?
Eh, there's a lot of different flat Earth cosmologies you could come up with, I wouldn't make any confident assertions about what a flat Earth implies until which cosmology the flat-Earthers are pushing is actually settled - or at least until debating a particular flat-Earther pushing a particular cosmology. Although the classic answer (literally) would be a Ptolemaic model with lots of epicycles.
By the way, I'm not commenting on the other guy's posts any more, but in the video of the gyroscope that doesn't pick up the rotation of the earth (it might be the video of the second experiment, I'm not sure) he states that he called the manufacturer of the gyro, and the manufacturer stated that that gyro is not sensitive enough to pick up the rotation. But he still went ahead with the experiment anyway, knowing it would fail.
Here's a debunk video of the gyro experiment. It's in 2 parts.
I wish NASA could afford to put out a real photograph of the Earth! #It'sFlat
Maybe they should tape an 8x11 piece of paper over the window of the "space" shuttle like that did in the Apollo "capsule". That shuttle is a 747 (or similar) gutted passenger jet with rockets underneath to trick people into thinking it can actually go into outer space, when in effect, it flies lower than the U2 planes lol:))))