Cars are fast moving, you are in the car. Suddenly, you feel excited to see someone special. You have a strong desire to jump from the moving car with enough thought. Just before jumping on the door ... ... you remember Newton's words, remembering his first formula, the inertia. Think of it jump in front of this ...

Well, what is the best way to get out of moving buses? Newton asked to jump ahead? No! His 1st formula but the other speaks😯 . It is a common misconception that due to Know being moving from the moving bus to the front. But this is not the case. And jumping in front is not the best way, there is a better way. Let's see, what that way.
From Newton's 1st Form, we get the idea of ​​the inertia and the ball. In a word, the stability of the object remains steady and the moving object is dynamic. Accordingly, soon after leaving the bus from the moving bus, our body went ahead in front of the body due to inertia. In this case, leaping forward means that you increased your velocity (jitters + jump forward); What is the meaning of scandal knowingly ?

If you have to jump back? That's the problem too. Even though jumping backwards, we can reduce the effect of anatomically (Inability - jump back), but we can not control ourselves because of reversing (inverted) (because we do not have to walk on the opposite path), due to there is nothing else to do .
It looks like, even if you jump in front, the problem, the more problems jumping back; Then what can be done? The solution is to not jump from moving bus.

Even if you want to jump for special reasons, but it is better to jump in front. Although our velocity increases in the past, we can easily take control of a few steps. It is not possible to jump back.
That means we do not jump about (or newton according to the first formula) considering the inability. But some give it! They jump into Newton's first formula and they can go on forever! Who are these !! Superman 🙄? No, they are bus helper 😯! These are the sub-consciousness or the experience of the 'front-no-back' solution of this paradox.
The most scientific and best way to move from moving bus is to jump forward (straight) and jump backwards. It also reduces the effect of the inertia (jumps on the opposite side of the inertia) and also does not have to be troubled due to body control due to rotation in front. If you notice very well, the helper, in the same way as they are leaving the bus. But of course you do not want to use this notebook. Because, you are not a helper, because the helper's practice is that they can work in comfort. If you work on this I will be overburdened. Or you can see that the rush has got rid of the totals, jumped back and forth (opposite) in front of the bus; Then the rest is history .
Well then another question; If it is that you have goods with you. You have to leave the goods before leaving yourself and then get down. In that case, the goods can not be moved forward; There will be an increase in the speed at the touch of the ground and the condition of the goods will be delayed. So you have to put the goods back, you do not have to worry about how the goods will keep themselves under control. Because there is nothing in front of the material behind the human face, all is equal .

Then we learned, it is better to jump goods in front of us and move ahead for ordinary passengers like us. Oh! What's the better? What is Brave in jumping from moving bus? It's best not to jump from moving bus .
Now think of yourself, why do you have to give the right foot at the time of getting out of the bus? Why do you have to leave the left leg at the time of the departure? If you can not understand the comment.

Now let's go to another topic,
"If there is no external force, then fixed objects will remain fixed forever, and moving objects will move smoothly."

Who gave the first formula of this Newton above 🙄? Though there are fools and stupid questions, but there is some dispute over the answer. Because before the birth of Newton, the scientist Galileo Galilei explained the inability. Has proved (experimentally) that dynamic objects without external force will continue to live in life . Let's take a look at the great test of Galileo,
Galileo first released 1 ball from the height of one of the two floors in the adjacent corner.(image)

image source

And it has been seen that the ball has been lowered again to almost the same level (in the second floor). Almost because of the fact that due to friction, the previous height can not be ascertained. But we can ignore friction.
Then Galileo did more to increase the angle between the two floors. And did the same experiment again (image).

image source

It was also seen that the ball was on the 1st floor, the second bottom (or almost) just got up to that height.
This time Galileo was having fun, he began to grow in the middle of the two corners in the equator. To increase the raise, the second floor was horizontal once. (Image)

image source

Now I can say in the case of the previous case, this time the ball at first height will rise to the height. And there will be dynamic until it is not ready. Since the second floor is in a horizontal position, we can say that the ball can not be equal to the initial height even though it is dynamic. But do not give up, he will be dynamic all day long to reach that height. (The spiritual aspects of this test should be kept in the mind of all people).
In other words, if there is no physical force, then dynamic objects are moving fast. However, this invention has not been written as Galileo's source. Newton. As a result, Newton was given a full credit rating .
Newton first mentions that the fixed objects without an external force will remain fixed (this does not come to Galileo's head). And Newton gave the elaborate interpretation of the first ball. Newton's first explanation (second and third sources) is that the more force and force of the ball are shown.
Anyway, once again, back to unity, the concept of inertia is a unique creation for science. Many mysteries can be explained by this inertia. Let us see some examples,
the rotation of the moon around the Earth or all kinds of rotations can be explained by the inertia.

image source

Due to inertia, the object wants to exit the tangent, but the centerpiece turns its direction. And it keeps running, every point at every point. As a result, the objects rotate in circles.
It is explained by the fact that why is the tide on the earth (image)

image source

When we stop the bus due to inclement weather, we tend to lean forward, and then we start leaning back. By using this effect, we did not have a pedal without riding the bicycle far enough. Fill in the cram board. Also, in many other places of everyday life, the application of newness of Newton's first formula is seen.
But the reality is that Newton's 1st formula is not effective in many areas of our daily life. This formula is applicable only for Inertial Reference Frame .
Well, what is the Inertial Reference Frame? And what is the Reference Frame?
The Reference Frame is a specific coordinate system that describes the position and motion of an object. For example, the moving bus is an Reference Frame, again you are standing on the footpath, it is also a Reference Frame. Now we can describe the position and motion of an object in relation to any one reference frame in order to explain an event. The events will vary according to different reference frames. For example, if you throw a penny out of the bus, the bus's observer will see the penny falling down on the straight line; And on the footpath another observer of the Reference Frame will see the amount of money problem.

And the Inertial Reference Frame is a special reference frame, so that the relative velocity of all objects is 0 or constant. If there is an acceleration of an object in the same reference frame (ie relative velocity is not constant), then inertial reference frame will not be there. For example, all kinds of rotation speed, various events of moving bus; In these cases, the relative perspective changes in different objects of the same reference frame, acceleration; As a result, these are non-Inertial Reference Frame.
Let's see how Newton's 1st formula does not apply to the non-reference frame. Suppose a bus is running, this bus is our 1st Reference Frame. Now the bus driver (the good driver tied with the seatbelt) stopped suddenly moving the bus. What will happen then? All passengers on the bus will be tilted in front, but due to the stacked seatbelt, the driver will remain stable. That is, there is no relative velocity and constant at all in the same reference frame, the acceleration has been created (the driver stays, but the rest are leaning forward). That means it's not the Inertial Reference Frame.
Now we see from the driver's point of view, he sees that he is stable, the bus is still fixed (he is no longer living because of a seatbelt tied). But even without any force, all the passengers of the bus are leaning in front of them, that is, speed conditions change without the ball 😯. Newton's violation of the formula 😯! The driver will never be able to interpret this phenomenon with reference to Newton's 1st formula. Seeing from the perspective of the passengers, the same thing will happen. There is no violation of Newton's law, Newton's law is not applicable for this Non-inertial Reference Frame.
If we look at the same event from the Inertial Reference Frame (standing on the footpath), then Newton's source suggests that the passengers are slipping in front of the inertia. The reason that Newton's formula applies to is that the event was observed in reference to the Inertial Reference Frame.
In the same way, for non-inertial reference frames, even for a rolling object. Because, the rotating object is constantly changing its direction, it changes the speed, which means it is fasting, that means accelerating. This is not the Inertial Reference Frame as the Earth is rotating, does it mean Newton's first formula anywhere in the world? No, not so much; The world's velocity is much less than the velocity of everyday life, which can be estimated near the Inertial Reference Frame.

The essence of all the say, Newton's formula is only true with the Inertial Reference Frame. If ever there is a confusing situation in opposition to Newton's 1st law, then first of all we should be aware that our reference frame is right.

Thank you