Technically, The Universe Shouldn’t Exist. So, Why Does It?

in #science7 years ago (edited)

0.jpg

The origin of our universe is still one of the biggest mysteries that we have, despite there being pretty much a consensus about the big bang theory, which states that everything that there is, literally blew into existence from a single tiny point.

How the universe came into existence is something that you might read about or talk about commonly but what is not talked about generally by people is the why part. Why is the universe even there? It shouldn’t even exist, and yet it does.

Those of you who have read about this stuff know exactly what I’m talking about but I know many of you might be confused right now as to what I am even talking about.

To understand this, let’s go to the very instance of the big bang, when everything we see today, here on Earth and outside it, was created.

Matter Vs Antimatter

1.jpg
Image Credits

We all know that the big bang led to the creation of all matter, but did you know that there was an almost equal amount of antimatter produced at the same time?

Antimatter is the exact opposite of matter. A normal atom has a proton (a positively charged particle) and a neutron as it’s nucleus and an electron (a negatively charged particle). An antimatter atom has an antiproton (a negatively charged particle) and a positron (a positively charged particle).

Basically when a matter and its antimatter collide, they annihilate each other because they are the exact opposites of each other, leaving behind energy.

So, when at the instance of big bang, matter and antimatter were created, all of them should have just cancelled each other out and there shouldn’t even have been a universe. Yet, we see a mind-blowingly large universe and all of the objects are almost entirely made of matter!

Imbalance At Big Bang

2.jpg
Image Credits

Scientists are confounded by this. They say that matter and antimatter should have been equally created and if that had happened, there would be no universe today.

But something tipped the scale in favour of matter and the little matter that survived after the firecracker show during the first moments of the big bang, is everything that we see today.

This is what baffles scientists. There shouldn’t have been enough matter from the beginning to be able to create the hundreds of billions of galaxies or the hundreds of billions of stars in each one of them.

Associate Professor Martin Sevior of the University of Melbourne School of Physics says that this imbalance between matter and antimatter is a trillion times bigger than the standard model predicts.

Suggested Explanations

3.jpg

Scientists have been at work trying to find the answer to this riddle. There are some explanations that they have put forward and some they are actively experimenting upon.

One explanation they provide is that maybe the universe is divided into several regions where matter and antimatter exist separately. From afar, the antimatter would still appear as matter and maybe that’s why we haven’t detected it yet.

Another theory, which is being tested at the KEK particle accelerator in Japan, is that there may be differences in the rate of decay of matter atoms and antimatter atoms.

So, by the time the humungous amount of matter and antimatter got done annihilating each other, there could still have been enough matter left that we see in the form of the current universe. Nothing is proved till date and it might still take quite some time for us to solve this riddle.


Follow me @sauravrungta for more future content.

Sort:  

good question...

That's how we spam

Questions like these are really baffling and can drive you crazy if you start overthinking them. I doubt we will come close to an answer in our lifetime. Still, a nice topic to discuss from a philosophical aspect when having drinks with friends. :)

Yeah, I have high hopes that these questions will be answered within the 21st century. It would be a bummer to die without knowing these answers.

May be after our death we will know the mystery of universe, where science stops spirituality starts.

That is plausible too!

It seems to me this is a metaphysical question and modern culture insists that scientists should try to explain it.

This is such an interesting topic. Sometimes I go to bed at night dreaming about the mysteries of our universe.

haha me too!! It's actually beautiful to be on a tiny planet as tiny humans and yet think about the biggest thing there is and trying to contemplate the meaning of it all.

or maybe earth is a stimulation and nothing is real! LOL Still thinking about my alien theory. hehe.

haha If that theory is real, we may as well stop looking for the answers to current questions. We will then focus on finding our "programmers" and how to get in touch with them lol

hahah... next blog article... "How to get in touch with the aliens" :)

The universe exists within ourselves.. there is nothing external...

all but mind's projection

Thanks to Nisargadatta Maharaj :)

Very good post.
Expecting more post alike this.

This is indeed still a puzzle today. New physics theories contain in general many possible other sources that will yield the matter-antimatter asymmetry that is needed. But which one is the good one and what is the correct mechanism are questions we are still after :)

Yeah, this is so interesting and frustrating to think about at the same time haha. I just wish we find some concrete answers within our lifetime :)

Me too! :)



Join us on #steemSTEM / Follow our curation trail on Streemian

Thank you for this very interesting article. It has been advertised on our chat channel (and upvoted).

The steemSTEM project is a community-supported project aiming to increase the quality and the visibility of STEM (STEM is the acronym for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) articles on Steemit.

Consider this scenario. What if we're experiencing the equivalency of standing inside a server (matter) or display (data) looking around. Chances are, the answers are in the programming of the computers using the servers and data (intention for experiences). To do what was intended is most likely what we are doing. Where we are is to facilitate that doing. Perhaps?

Are you referring to the matrix theory?

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.14
JST 0.030
BTC 59933.20
ETH 3191.47
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.44