Sure, but maintain a MVThreshold for content/awareness, then the big-bang will expand ‘exponentially’; there has to be a recommendation & ‘trending’ sections to draw attention to draw variant ‘interest niche’s’ of readers; i.e., some don’t think trending is worthwhile, so prefer ‘personal recommendations’. YouTube should be gamed for this. Purely social aggregation nets of searched phrases with hidden monetary value beneath; which is how Steemit/open source should be: e.g., earnings-per-content should be semi-concealed, views/’resteems’ (although changed) as the front-end display for viewers - ‘unfortunately’ ‘computation-heuristics’ for measuring/judgement/appraisal are worthless if (1) a group’s weltanschauung is excessively-removed so as not to know/comprehend/care about X (2) there is no way of getting the information to them (particularly 1 influencing 2).

There ‘is’ also an interpretation gap between singular people, as exists between social networks; which reflect changes in content/structure/design/ethos/pace of working etcetera. Each are moving towards a distinct telos [doesn’t have to be defined]. One information aggregation model doesn’t necessarily interfold onto another. They have their specific sign-traces. :)