The human eco-system

in #science6 years ago

What is a virus, as in what do we actually know about them? Firstly, the fact is, VERY LITTLE is actually known about them. They are DNA wrapped in a protein shell. They are not alive. These two things are known. Everything else is assumption. So put everything you’ve been taught/told aside while we piece the jigsaw together with facts that we DO know.
Taking the two known facts, would you say that these things have any way of ‘invading’ anything? No.
Where do they come from? Good question. I watched a talk by a Biologist last week who explained the intricate workings of our cells.
Two things jumped out at me. One was that at the centre of the nucleus of every cell is DNA wrapped in a protein shell. Sound familiar? He said this is a form of ‘blueprint’.
He then got into the function of genes and the genome, which would complicate matters for this article, but suffice to say these genes do not have any function of their own but they can be opened and closed by ‘keys’ that open the protein shell to ‘read’ the gene ‘blueprint’.
Now here something else struck me - antibodies. What do we know about them? Funnily enough ALSO VERY LITTLE. A very eminent ‘virologist’ Dr Stefan Lanka has this to say about antibodies.

"Antibodies are in reality, soluble blood proteins, which play a central role in the healing of wounds"

So using Occam’s razor, putting these two facts together would you come up with the fanciful theory that we have been presented with of invading pathogenic tiny bodies which no-one can see, which are not alive, getting into our bodies (from space?!), then into our cells to replicate themselves and then kill the cell?
Armies of tiny Y-shaped keys coming out of nowhere to ‘kill’ these tiny bodies which are STILL not alive? Do you see how ridiculous it all sounds now? Where is the scientific proof of this theory. Look it up - you won't find any.
Pictures of viruses? Nothing provable there either. Hard evidence that they are there? Nope, antibody tests, which as explained above, prove nothing and PCR tests which look for PROTEINS too. Do your own research with these things in mind.
So if disease is not caused by viruses then what DOES cause us to get sick?
Well lets look at ‘disease’ and find out what it is first. It is a set of symptoms. Mucus, rash, diarrhea, coughing, inflammation etc, let's look at those.
What happens if you ingest some poison? You vomit or if that doesn’t get it out quick enough you have diarrhea. Both are caused by the body expelling poison as quickly as possible. If poison enters the lungs we cough, again expelling the poison.
If you get it on your skin, then you get a rash which is poison being expelled through your tiny pores which is where we get the pus.
Pus and mucus are the same thing apart from being produced by different organs.
Pus is congealed poisons, kind of parcelled/bunched up for expulsion, the same as mucus. It is a slower expulsion, probably because the poison has managed to go deeper and therefore has to be rounded up before it can be expelled.
All symptoms can be lumped together as various ways of expelling poisons, even a fever or inflammation, which is the body’s way of increasing oxygen to the tissues where it is needed. (Look up “oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve”).
Just as our body heats up when we exercise in order to oxygenate the muscles as necessary, likewise the tissues need additional oxygen when they are working hard to expel poisons.
So now that we know what viruses are not, let's take a look at bacteria. Science is already way ahead of the mainstream but we are only getting the trickle of knowledge we now know as our microbiome. So what are they NOT telling us yet?
They already know that we have more microbes in our bodies than we do cells. In fact, they number more than 10x cells at the very least.
We know that they carry out essential functions in the body, to the extent that without the microbiome we would be dead.
I’m not talking about GUT bacteria alone, these bacteria are in every part of your body.
There are no good/bad bacteria either, they all have a function, the main ones that we know of are digesting food and cleaning up dead cells/tissues.
How do they get there? Another good question and it starts with birth. The baby picks up it’s first microbiome from the birth canal, which was illustrated by a nasty experiment on baby chimps. The chimps were delivered by caesarean section into a sterile environment, with no possible chance of any ‘contamination’ of any sort. They did not survive even a week. We pick up further bacteria through food (living food) and from everywhere in our environment from then on.
People like Gaston Naessans, Royal Rife and Beauchamp all saw these microbes. Rife and Naessans even invented better microscopes which can magnify LIVING cells (unlike the microscopes still used today). Why do you think these microscopes are not being used in medicine now? What do they not want us to see?
Naessans in particular has mapped out the total morphology of these microbes (which he calls somatids). They are not fixed; they change/morph/mutate, whatever you want to call it. This is fact and has been observed and filmed. They can even become a fungus. What sparks the change? The environment, in particular oxygen levels.
I, for one, do not believe these somatids can become ‘pathogenic’ either as this would not make sense. If they have to morph into a fungal form, then that is because there is no oxygen and what do fungus do? They clean up dead stuff but they also can eat up toxic stuff. (Have you heard of the discovery that fungus could be used to clean up oil spills?)
This is a work in progress and the importance of microbes in bodily function is still being investigated. I have tried to simplify it as much as possible for ease of understanding. I’d welcome input and thoughts as to what you think so far.
Watch this short video by my Amanda Volmer and see these somatids for yourself at the end.



Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63191.19
ETH 2615.47
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.73