Simple Question #2 - What is Life? Why does it exist at all?steemCreated with Sketch.

in #science3 years ago (edited)

Hey friends, I am back with the #2 Episode of Simple Question Series. Sorry for little delay as it took me a lot of time to research about the topic. I tried to bring the best I could. I hope you'll enjoy it. So, let's begin. :)


What is the difference between you and a rock? You may think what a stupid question am I asking. But even the smartest people in this planet have no idea where to draw the line between living and dead things. This leads to many mind-blowing speculations. What is life after all?

What is Life?

You are alive and so am I. The tree outside the window is alive. The bird chirping on the tree is alive. But the clouds in the sky are not alive, the laptop or smartphone on which you are reading this article is not alive. So how can we say that anything is alive or not? In most of the cases our intuition gives us the correct answer. And in some cases (like viruses) even science fails to tell correctly whether something is alive or not. So it becomes really difficult to figure out an exact definition of life. Thus, researcher Christopher Voigt of University of California says,

"We don't have a very good definition of life".

The question, "What is life?" has troubled the scientists and philosophers through ages.

Aristotle was probably the first person who made an attempt to define life. He suggested that life is something that grows and maintains itself and reproduces.


Erwin Schrödinger

Austrian physicist, Erwin Schrödinger in his book, "What Is Life? The Physical Aspect Of The Living Cell", suggested that living things avoid decay into disorder and equilibrium. His idea is related to the second law of thermodynamics which states that every closed system will naturally gain entropy or disorder over time. But by utilizing nutrients from the environment and metabolizing them, living things can work against this trend and can maintain order (low entropy) inside.

But what about crystals of snow and other materials, which absorb energy to create order in their structure? Are they alive?

This is the issue which persists in almost all the current definitions. There are many exceptions and contradictions in them.

For example, some researchers have proposed that we may call a thing living if it can reproduce. But this theory excludes Mules, which are born sterile, and will include non-living things like fire which can grow and reproduce by creating more fire.

Many others have claimed that life is what that can metabolize - that it can take in energy and nutrients, carry out some complex chemical reactions, which will result in movement, growth, waste release etc. - but many non-living things like cars, fire show similar properties.

These loopholes are making the scientists and researchers more confused. They are unable to accept any of the proposed definitions.

As biochemist David Deamer points out,

"Life, because it is such a complex system of things with many interacting parts, each of which is essential, it is really tough to make a definition".

Even after these difficulties some scientists are not ready to give up. They say that as we are aware of only one type of life form, that is of Earth, so it is becoming difficult to find a universal definition of life. Even if we make a working definition on the basis of properties of life available on Earth, we may not be able to identify life on other planets.

Probably we may get some idea about life and the basic elements required for its existence if we study the origin of life on earth.

How Did Life Originate and Why?


Stromatolites: fossilized earliest microorganisms

By measuring the ages of the oldest rocks on Earth, ages of Moon rocks and meteorites, geologists have suggested that Earth was formed around 4.5 million years ago. But still scientists are unsure when and how life emerged on the Earth. There are plenty of ideas but few clear facts.

It is generally believed that the all life forms that we see today emerged from a single primitive ancestor. But it is not known how this primitive life form came into existence, however, scientist believe that it was a natural process which took place perhaps 4.2 billion years ago. And it is also speculated that the first life form was originated underwater.

Earliest records of life forms are found in the form of fossilized microorganisms. Recently such fossils have been discovered in iron and silica rich rocks of Quebec, Canada. They are found to be 4.28 billion years old while it is found that oceans came into existence 4.4 billion years ago. This shows that the emergence of life was almost instantaneous after the formation of oceans. Thus it may be possible that if life emerged so quickly on Earth, then it must be a common thing in the universe.

Many theories have been proposed to explain the 'origin of life'. In the 1920's, two scientists, Aleksander Oparin and J. B. S. Haldane separately came up with a similar theory, which is now popularly known as Oparin-Haldane hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, life on earth could have originated from non-living matter through a process called "gradual chemical evolution".

In the then oxygen-poor atmosphere of the Earth, simple inorganic molecules may have reacted with energy from sunlight or lightning to form building blocks of life, like amino acids and nucleotides which could have accumulated in the oceans, forming a "primordial soup".

These building blocks may have further reacted with each other to form more and more complex molecules (polymers) such as proteins and nucleic acids. And these complex polymers may have come together to form a closed structure to maintain homeostasis which have later on become capable of metabolism.

In 1953, an experiment was carried out by Stanley Miller and Harold Urey to test the Oparin-Haldane hypothesis. They found that organic compounds could be created from the inorganic matter as suggested by Oparin-Haldane hypothesis. They created a closed environment similar to the early earth and simulated the effect of energy (like lightning) on the environment through electric sparks. They ran the experiment for a week and found that various types of amino acids, lipids, sugars and other organic molecules had formed, which are the building blocks for other complex organic compounds like protein, DNA, RNA etc.


Primitive structure of the first Cells

Recently, a young physicist of MIT, Jeremy England has proposed that living things are better in absorbing and using energy from the environment and dissipating some part of that energy as heat, than inanimate clumps of carbon atoms. He has developed a mathematical formula which indicates that when a group of atoms is driven by an external source of energy (like sunlight, heat, electricity, chemical fuel etc.) and surrounded by a heat bath, like ocean or atmosphere, then it will automatically restructure itself in such a way that it dissipates increasingly more energy. This suggests that under certain conditions matter inevitably acquires the basic physical and chemical features associated with life.

Thus England remarks,

"You start with a random clump of atoms, and if you shine light on it for long enough, it should not be so surprising that you get a plant".

Even though we have got some idea about how the basic organic compounds came into existence, but still scientists are unsure which complex molecule (polymer) first came into existence that became self-replicating or self-perpetuating, meeting the basic criteria for life.

Many scientists support the RNA-world hypothesis (or genes-first hypothesis), according to which first life forms were self-replicating RNA which contained the genetic information, and other things like metabolism were a letter add on.

Another cult of scientists favors the "metabolism-first hypothesis" which suggests that self-sustaining networks of metabolic reactions may have been the first simple life forms (preceding the emergence of RNA or DNA).

Whatever may be the first compound it was still very much primitive and simple as compared to the complex life forms of today. The arrival of human beings was not an easy way and took a very long process which continued for billions of years. Did these complex organisms emerge from a primitive ancestor?

How Did Complex Life-Forms Emerge?

As we discussed, the first step for life was the formation of simple organic compounds which later on combined to form such complex compounds which could contain genetic code and maintain metabolism. The first such self-sustaining structure which might be said to have had life was "cell".



Cell is called the fundamental unit of life as all the life forms, from simple to highly complex, are made up of cells. A cell contains all the basic characteristics of life. It is basically a protein based robot, too small to feel and experience anything. A cell is surrounded by a wall or membrane which separates its inner constituents from the outer world and maintain a constant inner environment (homeostasis) favorable for metabolic reactions to take place. A cell is also capable of reproducing by performing the process of cell-division.

The early cell that came into existence was very much primitive and simpler. It may not have had developed cell wall at that time. Cell wall may have been developed later on to carry out metabolic process more efficiently. Similarly, different cell organelles like ribosome, vacuole, lysosome, nucleus etc. may also have been developed gradually as per requirement in the later generations of the cell. These unicellular life forms (cells) later on multiplied and combined to form multicellular organisms which wear more accustomed to survive and dominate in the contemporary environment.

This change continued through billions of years, which resulted in the formation of this vast biodiversity we are a part of. This process of change is called "evolution".

All the living organisms undergo evolution, which means that their genetic code get slightly modified to add or remove characteristics, whatever maybe suitable for the environment. It mostly follows the Darwinian theory of "Natural Selection". According to this theory, organisms which could develop such traits which are crucial for survival in an environment would live and the organisms which could not develop such traits would eventually die. So, the population of the biologically superior species would dominate. Darwin called this process "survival of the fittest".


Blue Whale - an example of a complex organism

Evolution is a continuous never ending process. So, are humans still evolving? The answer is 'Yes', evolution is going on slowly but steadily, generation after generation. Probably after thousand years from now humans shall have a more powerful brain.

But there is an inherent and most important purpose of the origin of life and the process of evolution – hidden in the second law of thermodynamics. Read on to find out.

What is the purpose of life?

This question is an important one and has been answered in different ways. In spiritual point of view, the purpose of life is to be blissful and to worship the divine, the attainment of 'moksha' through enlightenment. From social and moral point of view, the purpose of life is to be a good human being, to work for the betterment of the human civilization.

But being a person with scientific temperament, I would like to find the scientific purpose of life which relates to the existence of the universe.

So, what if I say, "the purpose of life is to carry out a mission". All living creatures, from cats and dogs to human beings, are on a mission – to fulfill the second law of thermodynamics.

There is a high tendency in the universe increase entropy (disorder) and the free (low entropy) energy to be used up to release high entropy energy. The early Earth was packed with low entropy conditions, with a lot of available useful energy. But there was no way to tap into that useful energy.

It required a bunch of very complex reactions to take place to actually use that useful energy. This process led to the formation of some complex compounds which could carry out the system of reactions more efficiently and easily. This eventually kept on creating more complex systems and finally formed a living cell.

A cell could use more of that useful low-entropy energy to maintain its inner order and release less useful high-entropy infrared light and heat energy, thus taking part in the process of increasing the entropy of the universe. A cell could also multiply to make more of it which could take part in the great mission.

And this is how evolution took place and complex multicellular organisms came into existence which could help in the entropy increase in much larger amount.

Even the stars, e.g. our Sun takes low entropy Hydrogen atoms and convert them into Helium and releases a large amount of heat and light energy with higher entropy. And we living organisms on Earth, take that heat and light energy, use that for our biological purpose and release even higher entropy infrared light. So, it may be said that we are on a mission to increase the entropy of the universe just like the stars do.


We saw that how it's difficult to understand life and draw a line between living and non-living things. But still we can make guesses on the basis of some characteristics of the living creatures like metabolism, reproduction and most importantly evolution.


Biological Virus

But sometimes, things like viruses make the scene more complicated. Viruses show all the properties of non-living things when they are alone, but when they enter any living host, they become alive and start showing all the characteristics of a living creature. Some viruses are such that they can enter dead cells and reanimate them so that they can become host for them, which is very weird. Virus is probably a transition between living and dead.

Hence, some scientists like Cleland points out that definitions and not the right way to go. We are unable to define life because we are lacking in theories. Like for example, early scientists tried to define water before they understood chemistry. It was just after the discovery of the elements Hydrogen and Oxygen, that the scientists were able to find out water is a compound of the two.

However, the ideas of the origin of life have revealed much about it. It has thrown light on the fact that life is not a rare phenomenon and has very less to do with luck. Life was originated from simple non-living matter through an inevitable natural process. The basic constituents of life include energy, Carbon, liquid water, and a few other elements like Nitrogen, Sulphur and Phosphorus.

But, recently a type of bacteria was discovered which could use arsenic in place of phosphorus to build its DNA. This discovery gives rise to the speculations that life may arise on other planets which have plenty of useful energy, even with other elements and constituents, which can work for the universal purpose of increasing entropy.

Thus, NASA defines life as

"a self-sustaining system capable of Darwinian evolution".

This definition opens the doors too many more possibilities of the existence of life. Probably we may find extraterrestrial life without knowing what it is!

Wait! Before going to the outer space in search of life, we much check out our computers. A physicist once said that life started with a simple code which gradually became complex through evolution. Well, this is somewhat analogous to a computer program. For example, a computer virus is capable of replicating itself by using its host computer's energy. You may argue it to be alive! And with a going on research on Artificial Intelligence and with the advent of Google's Machine Learning Program, maybe we are on the verge of creating artificial life in computers.


Artifical Life - an imagination

Image Source: Pixabay | Pexels | Google Public Domain Images

What do you think about life? Any new theory or idea related to our existence you want to share. Do let me know through your comments.
Your feedback and suggestions are important for me.


Previous Episode of the Series


Nice article! I'm going to release my theory on life soon too. I do not believe in god, so it won't be a god-theory, rather a pizza theory on life :)


Thanks. :)

Will like to check out that pizza theory of life. :D

It's coming after the theory on the universe though :P
And thanks :) Atleast I got 1 viewer ;D

Very interesting article and I really like it

Congratulations @nitesh9! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Great content.. There is simple DNA structure for all living forms in sanskrit is called a pancha mahabhuta, or "five great elements", such as earth, water, fire, air and aether. All living things are made of these so, every living thing is the part of rock as well as nature and this whole cosmic universe.

Yeah, these ideas were also of ancient Greek philosophers.

But later on we knew that, all matter is made up of minute particles called Atoms.

And a new theory has emerged that everything is just a vibration of space (Quantum Field Theory).

It's not true! God created the entire world that includes everything in 6 days, as described in the bible, and it was less than 6000 years ago. Only scientists that don't believe in him try to come up with some theories that don't have hand and feet.

So it's not true? This whole detailed theory isn't true? Are you sure about that? Got any proof to back that statement up maybe? As there are a lot of fossiles found which were way older than 6000 years. Besides, where is that god? Is there any proof of his existence?

Theories that don't have hand and feet? Incorrect. The generally accepted theory is explained here and it is very logical! I don't get how this theory doesn't have hand and feet? You're stating COMPLETE nonsense!

If I will show you an iPhone and tell you it was created by itself would you believe me? Now look at yourself the creation of your body is 1,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000+ times more complicated. It couldn't happen by itself even in 1,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 years. And something interesting - our mouth in our head - not in our feet. So we don't have to bend down to feed our body. This is only one example - there are thousands more. Also every few years there should be new animals that weren't before, why don't we see them. This is in short but just think of that how every thing is made with such wisdom on it's place It just must be a creator even if you don't know him.

I would not believe it untill I am shown the logic behind it. An iPhone is manufactured in industrial complexes, rather than through cell-reproduction. Anyone knows that.

It's the same story with the body. It's more complicated, but definitely not 100000000000000000000000000000 times more difficult to explain. If you just did your research, you would understand the logic of how the body is created from its supersmall state.

As this post explained, it took billions of years for life to evolve into intelligent apes, like us! It took many fortunate events to create us, but it took over 4 billion years for evolution to create us... I don't see how a god suddenly explains it all... Where the F would that god come from?

Our mouth is in our head, because evolution brought us that. It's obvious that species with mouths in their feet wouldn't survive very long, so only the animals with mouths on their head would survive. Then through reproduction, the genes of that animal which survived more easily (with mouth in head), were given to the next generation. Through mutation, that turnt into different species with different kinds of mouths, but there would have to be HUGE changes to suddenly transform it to species with their mouth in the feet...

Yes. New animals are constantly created. Where they are? We haven't even found all currently existing species yet... How can you expect us to find every newly created species? Besides, many mutations could end up in new species, but they could get extinct by US (HUMANITY) before we even figure out about them!

Everything is made with such wisdom on its place? There is a freakin universe with litterally QUADRILLIONS of stars&planets! Ofcourse there is a place where intelligent life comes to existence! And that place MUST have everything in its place and look like it's made with wisdom, because otherwise we wouldn't exist! If we had mouths in our feet, we would be eaten by the predators before we could start eating them... We would be extinct before we could even start making theories about where we came from.

Therefore, it doesn't really have to be "a creator"...

To be honest, I don't know how everything is created. I simply follow the (in my opinion) most probably and logic theory. And in this case, a creator isn't very probable and logic...

I respect anyone's ideas, as long as they respect the ones of others too. Calling stuff not true doesn't belong to that respect. I therefore don't feel like I should respect your ideas :)

Follow my blog for more! :) @pizzachain for the win!

There is no point in debating such an obvious thing. If you would travel in a dessert and see a beautiful castle, and you would walk in and see that everything is perfect, but you don't see the owner. Would you say that it was created by itself in 10000000000 years because you don't see the owner?

There is no way to explain how a human person that has tons of complex features should combine to work together so perfect even in a 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
years. If you are looking for the truth you will find it. But if you want to live a free life without any obligations then keep yourself as you are and you will see the truth after death. And there are thousands of people that had clinical death and came back and said what they saw.
And why in the first place do you think that a human can be created in 10000000000 of years and a simple thing like an iphone not?

And what you say there is "QUADRILLIONS of stars&planets" what's the problem with that. You see that to day there was no other planet found with live cells on it.
And interesting there is no animals that were found till now, that you can say it evolved just now and wasn't before.


There can be truth to both sides of the coin. The bible does state 6 days, but when you read it you need to understand that it is not just a written word - it is full of symbolism. Speak to various people that have studied theology and you will find that is the understanding of most people. So while the bible says the world was created in 6 days, it doesn't specify what a day is to Him. This means that 1 day in God's eyes could be 10,000 years in our time. The reason for 6 is because the number 7 is actually a very spiritual number and is referenced several times throughout the bible. :)

The people who came with that theory - did that because they don't want to believe in God, so anything they say is just to oppose the creation of the world by God. So both sides can't be true. Also Adam was created on the 6'th day, and you can see how much years he lived. It's 930 years and that's regular human years.

I respect your view.

There must be some divine power behind the origin of life, and science is unable to find that which keeps scientists baffled. That energy is present everywhere in the universe.

Science is unable to find out why universe is expanding, which power is working behind that. We don't know the limits of the universe.

Science is soon going to touch the glass wall. But still scientists are searching, maybe some day we shall be able to see God (the supreme energy which is running the universe), through science.

There are many scientists that started believing after doing their research. It is known that Einstein believed in God.

Great article. Upvoted and resteemed!

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by nitesh9 from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, and someguy123. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you like what we're doing please upvote this comment so we can continue to build the community account that's supporting all members.

Great job, keep the posts coming. Really enjoyed reading this, thank you for sharing :)

Thank you so much bro.
I'm happy that you liked it. :)

Great article. I would question one of your points. You mentioned that humans are still evolving and perhaps in 1000 years our brains will be more advanced. Though our collective knowledge, science and technology is currently rapidly improving I dont see how are species' brain will evolve. Darwin's therory is about survival if the fittest. 100,000 years ago that would literally mean stronger fitter humans were more likely to survive and reproduce, meaning the stronger, fitter geans would perpetuate. Our intellectual abilities would have also given us the edge when hunting, cooking, surving etc. So yes in the old days our brains were evolving. Fast forward to today though, intelligent people may thrive economically but they are not necessarily breading more and passing on more geans than less intelligent people. The more developed a nation becomes the more this becomes true, it may even be the case that we are de-evolving. The less intelligent and less ambitious in society are given social security/government benifits etc and they apoear to be having more children than hard working more intelligent people. Our brains will only evolve if only the most intelligent people in society reproduce and the rest do not, this as I have stated is not the case in developed countries and even the opposite is more true.

Few years back when there was not much technological advancement and children were not that smart. But with more and more exposure to the advancing technology and internet children are becoming more knowledgeable about science and technology.

You may notice that the chapters which were previously taught in class 10 (in 90s), now they are being taught in class 8.

And with the increasing population and advancing automation, jobs are much lesser and competition is increasing rapidly. Now only the most intelligent people are selected in a specific job. And this trend will continue. Less intelligent people will eventually become extinct.

So, the brains of humans must have to be evolved for existence in the future.

What you say is mostly true but you are missing my point. Those who are intellegent are going to get better jobs and a better standard of living, yes. However those who are less intelligent and cant get jobs are still reproducing arguably more than the more intelligent are. They are not dying out due to lack of food, mr & mrs tax payer through the government helps them with that. Darwins theory of evolution requires the strong to survive and the week to die off and not reproduce. In this case for our brains to advance the less intelligent would have to die out and not reproduce, in a modern developed country this is simply not the case.

People are, as a whole, becoming more intelligent generation after generation because of more exposure to technology and development of science. Yes, the process is very slow, but it's still there.

Check this out for more info.:

Fabulous post / fabulous topic ... Live life for the right reason! peace Thanks for supporting the Sci tag !!


Peace is important if humans want to exist.

good post @nitesh9 nicely thought out and I really liked reading your all encompassing research on what life is and isn't ... worth every penny it's earned ! I've bookmarked it for re-read (rare) upvoted & following for more

Thank you @outerground. Am happy that you like it.

Studying and researching hard bring out another great question.

Also exams are near so it will take little more time.

well as long as you can fit it in between your studies, research into one subject or field often provides inspiration for another line of inquiry

This is great! So much information to think about and take in (at least at 11pm!) Gonna have to re-read it :) Upvoted and Resteemed :)

Thank you so much. :)

In my humble opinion, life is a manifestation of energy.
Everything is energy :)
You might enjoy Quantum Physics.

Yeah. Energy is the base of existence and all biological process.

And also matter and energy are interconvertible.

That was an awesome article. From now on, when I catch a cold, I'm going to consider it an attack by the undead. ;-)

Yeah. :D

Zombie virus!


Good post. Keep it up.

Thanks. :)

This post has received a sweet gift of Dank Amps in the flavor of 4.10 % upvote from @lovejuice thanks to: @badastroza. Vote for Aggroed!

Very interesting @nitesh9. I am interested in so many topics, and you did a great job with this one! I am still very new, but am so happy that I saw this posted on PAL!

Thank you. :)

very good.
I would be happy if you like to follow me and give your opinion about my posts.

Congratulations @nitesh9! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments received

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

well explained,worth resteem and voteup "the purpose of life is to carry out a mission" you're absloutely right i completely agree with you
i'm always wondering why am i alive ? surely there is a reason ? there no coincidence , so i beleive that everyone of us is here for specific purpose and once we know why we are here our mission tends to start
it seem like we have somthing in common , am also interested in those topics
i'll be happy if you check my post about "luck" and tell your opinion