You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Anti matter - the fuel of the future
What I am saying the following. In order to produce antimatter, you need to provide some energy. If what you need to provide is larger than what you get, in this case, using it as fuel is not viable.
PS: Thanks for updating your post btw.
You dont understand....... It does not produce more power it is a store of it. We can use it to power things not connected to a grid.......or in other words......fuel.....
No I don't understand. Antimatter does not exist in nature. Before storing it, you need to produce it, don't you?
It doesn't need to produce more energy than was used to create it........it only needs to produce energy........
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fuel
here is the definition of fuel
I think you are the one not understanding. Before being able to use anything, you must produce it. If the costs necessary to produce this thing exceed the gains, it is not economically viable.
You do not seem to understand at all what antimatter is, how to produce it and how to store it. That's all. Read more about it and then come back to me. This conversation leads to nowhere.
batteries cost more to produce then the power they produce.......
It is literally a battery......it stores power for use on something that is not connected to a grid.......we don't connect cars to the grid.....we need something that can move them that doesn't weigh that much for example.....it would take more power to produce but you can't connect cars directly to a power grid.......you need a fuel