Theory of The Beginning of The Matter And The Existence (A work in progress): Introduction

The Big Bang Theory (not to be confused with the popular sitcom) is the main stream theory that explains how the matter, time and everything else that exists today came to the existence. It covers almost all the aspects that we can think of and it satisfies almost all our curiosities but there's a difference between the psychology and the physicality. Common people often lack this understanding and scientists don't have that kind of time to explain this difference that's why most of us confuses ourselves into taking fiction for reality. As long as something is not backed by physical and tangible proof it is seen as fictional. I don't have any physical proof to prove that my theory is absolutely correct(that's why I am calling it a theory) but I wonder if Scientist have any physical and absolute evidence to verify the Big Bang Theory. It is not physically possible(at least not yet) to have absolute evidences on some event that occurred billions of years ago. At the best we may have some trails of the events that may or may not lead us to anything concrete.

Don't get me wrong like I said before I am a nobody to make such bold statements but people(in general, myself included) like this sort of things, like when some noob like me "challenges" the big dogs, people enjoy that sort entertainment the most. I also respect the several theories that we all have in different religions and they also make perfect sense!

---

String theory covers most scientific and tangible points(in a way, we can verify their existence in the form of physicality). But according to my understanding we just have one Universe so we must have just one true explanation about the beginning that proves it all. Of course we don't have any way to go back in time(even before time) to see how the Universe was created. We don't have any direct method(s) to verify this and probably we will never have any. We just have the Imagination to believe and pursue, Technology to build tools and use them and Science to verify. We also have knowledge and reasoning that's how we know how to put 1 and 1 together to make a 2. Then we have good old physics and mathematics to get in details and examine and understand.

I know for a fact that there is a real story out there somewhere on "How the Universe was created". What we don't have is any in witnesses to verify this and to tell us how! Because the rationality and logic says that there can't be any witnesses before there was nothing at all. It's ludicrous to even think something like that. Also, this means there was no parallel witnesses either that were there to witness the creation hand to hand. This points us toward one thing that there was just matter and time to witness it's own creation. I doubt that there was any sentient being at all. This leads us to one explanation, we need to decode the matter and time itself if we want to get anywhere closer to knowing what exactly might have happened. Considering that the time and matter had that information integrated into it.

---

In today's time, we have knowledge on dark matter, dark energy, anti-matter etc. that we never had before and we also might know that how matter is created. But we are rather more curious about that one process that initiated the beginning of it all. But we(as in the curious ones) still have absolutely and utterly nothing to tell that. But we are just the infants of the Universe and I believe that as time passes by, we will have more understanding on it all.

Now comes the fun part(my theory), I believe that the process that has started it all was recursive in nature. This leads me into thinking that when we talk about the beginning of the Universe, do we refer to this beginning(beginning of the current Universe) or something from the past( many many billions of billions years ago, before this new beginning). Because as far as I can comprehend(and it exhausts all my brain juice to think this) Time might have already existed before matter and it is not connected with matter in a way we tend to think. And when I say time, I don't mean the understanding that we have on current time but the time or the part of the time that is unknown, undiscovered, incomprehensible, etc. We don't really understand time in the same way as it truly exists. We only know that something called "time" exists. We also don't have complete knowledge on the matter itself individually or collectively. We haven't traveled the whole Universe, we haven't traveled even the half of it. Truth be told, none of us has ever been outside the solar system. We can only remotely observe and occasionally collect some matter to examine in some high-tech labs, that's all. Science is also incomplete and we just follow the principles of a few great scientists, we mostly understand the Science that is documented in one way or other not all of it.

To Be Continued...

Don't forget to upvote & resteem. You can also follow me @kissofearth.