You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Global Sea Ice Area - This chart should worry you...
Of course we do not have much of a discussion...because people of "science" believe themselves above everyone else...in the grand scheme of things, there are a handful of people who call themselves scientists...they firmly believe their word is more important than any other piece of information available to man...and yet, how many hundreds of "proven science theories" have been changed throughout the history of man...flat earth/round earth...hell, they can't even prove gravity, other than to say it exists but they have no clue how...every single time they "learn" something new, it changes a "fact" they established in the past...science itself is the single biggest science denier!
No, it is not their word. It is the scientific process.
Thanks for the comment anyway.
Whether it is their word, or their "scientific process" matters not...if it alters the "facts" that were established by previous "scientific processes," then the entire system is faulty. In order for something to be proven factual, it must stand the test of time...which much of science does not.
But obviously you are ill equipped for such a debate, so I will bid you farewell. Thanks for the opportunity to comment...have a great holiday!
Dude they are not facts. They are theories and they are better than anything else anyone has to offer because they are testable. Please read the diagram below three or four times please. This is my last comment on this thread. Happy holidays to you too.
You continue to find new names for the faulty information you want others to blindly accept right along with you..."theories" or "facts", they continue to be debunked by future "theories" and "facts."
...and your continued refusal to actually engage in debate, leads one to assume you do not fully believe the "science" stuff yourself...which actually amounts to hypocrisy...but what do I know, I'm not an intelligent "science" supporter!
Happy Holidays!!!
Sigh. I know I said I was done commenting, but the flaws you describe are part of the process! Please read the above diagram a few more times.
If the "process" has "flaws," then the "results" are "faulty!" Thank-you for finally seeing the light!
Well this road leads to nowhere so I'm taking the exit. I will enjoy reading your final comment though. Thanks and happy holidays.
Of course it leads to nowhere...you are incapable of debate...either we all accept your "flawed" processes as scientific "proof" of errant theories, or we are not worthy of being spoken to...how do you people breathe with your heads jammed so far up there?